October 10, 2017 By Shane Schick 2 min read

Due to lack of preparedness, the average company’s response to cybersecurity attacks is causing more damage, financially and otherwise, than the breach itself, according to IBM Security’s vice president of threat intelligence, Caleb Barlow.

Lack of preparedness for cybersecurity attacks continues to be an issue for organizations. In fact, a study from the Ponemon Institute found that 75 percent of organizations do not have an incident response plan applied consistently across the organization. With the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in effect starting in May 2018, organizations that do not disclose breaches within 72 hours risk facing fines of up to 20 million euro or 4 percent of global revenues, whichever is higher.

Speaking at the recent Wired Security 2017 conference in the U.K., Barlow told a real story in which he and his team had to inform a company about a cybersecurity incident. He said he was surprised to discover that the chief information security officer (CISO), chief information officer (CIO) and CEO were all absent on the call. Even worse, the briefing about the incident led not to an action plan, but a request that Barlow’s team put all the information into a PowerPoint presentation to be shared with the executive team later in the week.

“This is an issue of people not understanding the urgency that you’re under, and the need to respond and be on mission when something like a cyberbreach occurs,” Barlow said.

Demonstrating Leadership During Cybersecurity Attacks

Barlow explained that IBM Security has been developing a framework to show how companies act “left and right of boom.” The boom, in this case, refers to the moment a cybersecurity incident becomes public knowledge. While many organizations are focused on mitigating the damage of an attack when they first discover it, they often fail to consider their plan once customers and the media find out. Both are equally important.

Some good practices for dealing with “right of boom” moments include writing key numbers to call after a cyberattack on the back of employee badges, Barlow said. Some companies even have trucks roaming outside data centers filled with binders that detail key processes and satellite uplink connections that allow security professionals to receive data in the event of a communication failure.

“You need to demonstrate leadership during a breach,” he said. “If you don’t, if it looks like you’re trying to hide something … it’s not going to play well in the court of public opinion.”

The Commander’s Intent

Barlow described the right approach as “commander’s intent.” This includes focusing first on protecting the safety of employees and customers, then data and, finally, the company’s brand.

Watch the video to see Barlow’s complete talk, including the two sectors that IBM has deemed the best prepared to deal with cybersecurity attacks when they take place.

Watch the video: IBM Security’s Caleb Barlow and Wired Security

More from

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

DOD establishes Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy

2 min read - The federal government recently took a new step toward prioritizing cybersecurity and demonstrating its commitment to reducing risk. On March 20, 2024, the Pentagon formally established the new Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy to supervise cyber policy for the Department of Defense. The next day, President Joe Biden announced Michael Sulmeyer as his nominee for the role.“In standing up this office, the Department is giving cyber the focus and attention that Congress intended,” said Acting…

Unpacking the NIST cybersecurity framework 2.0

4 min read - The NIST cybersecurity framework (CSF) helps organizations improve risk management using common language that focuses on business drivers to enhance cybersecurity.NIST CSF 1.0 was released in February 2014, and version 1.1 in April 2018. In February 2024, NIST released its newest CSF iteration: 2.0. The journey to CSF 2.0 began with a request for information (RFI) in February 2022. Over the next two years, NIST engaged the cybersecurity community through analysis, workshops, comments and draft revision to refine existing standards…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today