February 15, 2012 By Amit Klein 2 min read

Last September, we blogged about a new polymorphic financial malware variant we had discovered. We code-named it “Shylock” because every new build bundles random excerpts from William Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice” in its binary. These are designed to change the malware’s file signature to avoid detection by antivirus programs and security software.

In recent weeks, we have seen a significant increase in the number of end-user machines infected with Shylock. One of this malware’s distinguishing characteristics is its ability to almost completely avoid detection by antivirus scanners after installation. Shylock uses a unique three-step process to evade scanners:

Step 1: Financial Malware Hides in Memory

Shylock injects itself into all running processes (applications) in memory. Every time a new application is initialized, Shylock suspends the application from running in memory, injects itself into the application process and then allows the application to proceed with its normal execution. Once installed, Shylock code doesn’t run as a separate process; rather, it embeds itself within every genuine application running on a machine. This makes it very hard to detect. Moreover, even if Shylock is detected, the fact that it is embedded in multiple running applications makes it almost impossible to stop and remove from memory.

Step 2: Watchdog Senses Scans

Shylock looks for and intercepts operations related to directory browsing and enumeration of registry keys, which indicate an antivirus scanning operation is underway. Once it detects “scanning” activity, Shylock deletes its own files and registry entries, making it undetectable. It remains active only in memory.

Step 3: Hijacks Windows’ Shutdown

Entries in the operating system registry allow malware (like any application or process) to execute its files as part of the start-up processes. Once Shylock has removed its files and registry entries to avoid being detected by an antivirus scan, it cannot survive a system shutdown/reboot. Any of these actions would remove it from memory and eliminate the infection. To ensure its survival, Shylock hooks into the Windows shutdown procedure and reinstates the files and registry keys (previously removed in Step 2) just before the system is completely shut down and after all applications are closed, including antivirus applications.

We have found that physically unplugging the machine’s power source (assuming it does not have an internal battery) after Shylock has deleted its files and registry entries to evade detection will clean the memory and also the Shylock infection. Needless to say, we do not recommend this as a malware-removal practice.

More from Banking & Finance

What’s up India? PixPirate is back and spreading via WhatsApp

8 min read - This blog post is the continuation of a previous blog regarding PixPirate malware. If you haven’t read the initial post, please take a couple of minutes to get caught up before diving into this content. PixPirate malware consists of two components: a downloader application and a droppee application, and both are custom-made and operated by the same fraudster group. Although the traditional role of a downloader is to install the droppee on the victim device, with PixPirate, the downloader also…

Exploring DORA: How to manage ICT incidents and minimize cyber threat risks

3 min read - As cybersecurity breaches continue to rise globally, institutions handling sensitive information are particularly vulnerable. In 2024, the average cost of a data breach in the financial sector reached $6.08 million, making it the second hardest hit after healthcare, according to IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach report. This underscores the need for robust IT security regulations in critical sectors.More than just a defensive measure, compliance with security regulations helps organizations reduce risk, strengthen operational resilience and enhance customer trust.…

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today