July 15, 2015 By Kevin Beaver 2 min read

On any given day, in enterprises large and small, many decisions are made about information security. The decision-making that goes into running a strong program is critical. Some security decisions are made consciously by well-informed individuals. Others are based on assumptions — often half-baked information about the current network security posture.

Fear Impacts Decision-Making

In many situations, security decisions are based on fear:

  • The fear of losing a job or otherwise negatively impacting a career;
  • The fear of losing the respect of management and peers;
  • The fear of getting into trouble with auditors or the law.

This fear is a normal part of how we work as humans. In every choice we make, there’s either a desire for gain or a fear of loss. The problem is, I’m seeing more and more critical security decisions being made from this negative angle rather than from a positive perspective based on facts and common sense. Friedrich Nietzsche once said, “There are no facts, only interpretations.” Even so, too many decisions are based on misinformation at best or no information at worst. They’re often highly political and rarely in the best interest of the business. A lot of the time, money and effort are being wasted. Of all areas of business, information security is not the place to squander critical resources.

Every Decision Counts

Whether or not IT and security professionals will admit it, we humans are creatures of emotion. The common perception (especially in IT and security) is that people make decisions logically, but it’s actually just the opposite. People decide on things emotionally and justify them logically. Simply understanding how we operate can help tremendously when it comes to making your own choices and dealing with the decisions of others that impact your work.

Security improvements come from lots of small, seemingly meaningless decisions made with good intentions. Everything you do — or don’t do — in security counts. My favorite lyricist, Neil Peart of the band Rush, once wrote that if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. Some people bury their heads in the sand and don’t want to acknowledge their security problems, but that’s not for you.

Dig your well before you’re thirsty. Decide that you’re going to focus on making sound security decisions in the best interest of the business. Form a security committee. Work to get and keep others on your side. Lead by example. People all around you, from your executives to your users to your colleagues outside of the business, are continually framing their opinions of you based on your choices and how you deal with theirs. Fear is a natural part of how we all operate. Just don’t let it define you, your role or information security in your organization.

These issues are complex at the core, yet they’re simple to deal with. It’s up to you to make it happen.

More from Risk Management

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

What should Security Operations teams take away from the IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index?

3 min read - The IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index has been released. The headlines are in and among them are the fact that a global identity crisis is emerging. X-Force noted a 71% increase year-to-year in attacks using valid credentials.In this blog post, I’ll explore three cybersecurity recommendations from the Threat Intelligence Index, and define a checklist your Security Operations Center (SOC) should consider as you help your organization manage identity risk.The report identified six action items:Remove identity silosReduce the risk of…

Obtaining security clearance: Hurdles and requirements

3 min read - As security moves closer to the top of the operational priority list for private and public organizations, needing to obtain a security clearance for jobs is more commonplace. Security clearance is a prerequisite for a wide range of roles, especially those related to national security and defense.Obtaining that clearance, however, is far from simple. The process often involves scrutinizing one’s background, financial history and even personal character. Let’s briefly explore some of the hurdles, expectations and requirements of obtaining a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today