February 6, 2017 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Vulnerability testing for software and networks is both necessary and ubiquitous, giving rise to tools such as the open source Metasploit framework. This can seek out weaknesses, run exploits and mimic attacks in the wild against corporate services.

The missing link is hardware. Given the difficulty of linking hardware directly to testing solutions, companies have typically relied on purpose-built services to ensure security. According to Dark Reading, however, a new Hardware Bridge API for Metasploit extends the functionality of this tool beyond the virtual, allowing security experts to directly hack their own hardware.

A Storm Is Brewing

While on-premises and cloud-based applications have been the go-to choice of cybercriminals over the last few years, this focus is changing as more Internet of Things (IoT) devices hit the market and more industrial enterprises opt for internet-facing control systems. The result is a potential hardware hacking deluge as attackers look for ways to breach physical systems and cause havoc.

As noted by Electronic Engineering Journal, for example, the growing popularity of 3-D printers comes with concern. If fraudsters are able to alter the firmware of these devices, they can change the configuration of output materials without detection. Sure, the changes would have to be small — joints slightly out of place or holes moved — but when it comes to strength-intensive applications that depend on specific design features, this kind of breach could be devastating.

Hackaday, meanwhile, pointed to the increasing number of “covert channels” that target hardware by bridging the air gap. It’s now possible to use fan sounds as a way to exfiltrate information, temperature variations to introduce malware and vibration to recreate keystrokes. Put simply, a storm of hardware hacks is brewing, and most companies aren’t ready for the rain.

How the Hardware Bridge Works

Dark Reading reported that the new Metasploit hardware bridge aims to reduce the complexity of device-based security tests, specifically in the automotive space. Security firm Rapid7, which owns the Metasploit project, announced plans to roll out support for additional verticals later this year.

So how does the hardware bridge work? Instead of relying on Ethernet, it leverages a combination of wireless communication and direct hardware manipulation, allowing manufacturers to enable support for Metasploit in firmware or create a relay service for devices without Ethernet access.

The Importance of Vulnerability Testing

According to Rapid7 developer Craig Smith, this allows companies “to utilize hardware to reach areas you couldn’t before,” such as a vehicle’s Controller Area Network (CAN) bus system, Dark Reading said. This, in turn, allows automakers to test for threats on devices that are not exposed to traditional networks but could pose serious risk if compromised.

Researchers have already demonstrated the ability to change a moving vehicle’s direction or speed by compromising its network-based components. Given the growing push for self-driving vehicles, it’s impossible to overstate the need for direct, straightforward hardware vulnerability testing.

Software and network testing are solid starting points, but in an IoT-enabled world, they’re simply not enough. Open source, easy-to-use hardware hacking tools represent the next step toward effective, physical cyberdefense.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today