August 10, 2017 By Mark Samuels 2 min read

Security researchers have demonstrated how it is possible to use stickers to get computer vision systems in autonomous vehicles to wrongly identify road signs.

Researchers from the University of Washington and other schools recently published a paper that describes a new attack algorithm, known as Robust Physical Perturbation (RP2). The report, “Robust Physical-World Attacks on Machine Learning Models,” detailed how the algorithm makes it possible for errant individuals to alter standard road signs and create havoc for self-driving car systems.

How Does the Attack Work?

The algorithm works in combination with printed images attached to road signs. These images, which could in theory be created by anyone with access to a color printer, confuse the cameras in autonomous vehicles.

The attack relies on undermining the computer vision systems of autonomous vehicles that have been taught to recognize items on or alongside roads using cameras. Computer vision systems in self-driving cars usually rely on an object detector, which identifies pedestrians, signs and vehicles, and a classifier, which works out the nature of the objects and the meaning of the signs.

Systems may be responsive to small alterations to their inputs, known as perturbations, that can cause the vehicles to operate in unexpected ways, reported Car and Driver. Actors would need to access the classifier and then use the RP2 algorithm to create a new, customized image of the existing road sign.

How the Computer Vision Systems Were Tricked

In one of the attacks, the researchers used the RP2 algorithm to create and print a full-size road sign that was placed over an existing warning sign. They created a stop sign that only looked faded to human eyes but was always read as a Speed Limit 45 sign by the computer vision system.

A second technique relied on placing small black-and-white stickers on a stop sign that, once again, led the computer vision system to wrongly identify a Speed Limit 45 sign.

The researchers reported the attacks were effective at a range of distances and angles. In the conclusion to their paper, they stated that they plan to test their algorithm further by altering other conditions that were not included this time around, such as sign occlusion and alterations to other warning signs.

The Implications for Autonomous Vehicle Design

Security fears over autonomous vehicle technology are nothing new. Experts have long directed attention toward the risk of hacks to in-car systems. Earlier this month, in fact, reports centered on a vulnerability in the Controller Area Network (CAN) Bus standard that could impact the security of connected automobiles.

However, this work demonstrated that computer vision systems can also be put at risk. The potential dangers are clear, particularly for vehicles that already use automatic sign recognition. An attacker with access to both the algorithm and the classifier in the in-car system could trick vehicles into responding incorrectly to signs.

While autonomous vehicle development is still at an early stage, self-driving car designers and in-car system manufacturers should take note of the potential dangers. Tarek El-Gaaly, senior research scientist at Voyage, told Car and Driver that such attacks were cause for concern and they could be easier to imitate in the future.

While the risk is limited now, the research highlighted how autonomous vehicle systems could be at risk from malicious actions in the future. Self-driving vehicle manufacturers and computer vision systems designers should take note.

More from

Remote access risks on the rise with CVE-2024-1708 and CVE-2024-1709

4 min read - On February 19, ConnectWise reported two vulnerabilities in its ScreenConnect product, CVE-2024-1708 and 1709. The first is an authentication bypass vulnerability, and the second is a path traversal vulnerability. Both made it possible for attackers to bypass authentication processes and execute remote code.While ConnectWise initially reported that the vulnerabilities had proof-of-concept but hadn’t been spotted in the wild, reports from customers quickly made it clear that hackers were actively exploring both flaws. As a result, the company created patches for…

Evolving red teaming for AI environments

2 min read - As AI becomes more ingrained in businesses and daily life, the importance of security grows more paramount. In fact, according to the IBM Institute for Business Value, 96% of executives say adopting generative AI (GenAI) makes a security breach likely in their organization in the next three years. Whether it’s a model performing unintended actions, generating misleading or harmful responses or revealing sensitive information, in the AI era security can no longer be an afterthought to innovation.AI red teaming is emerging…

What we can learn from the best collegiate cyber defenders

3 min read - This year marked the 19th season of the National Collegiate Cyber Defense Competition (NCCDC). For those unfamiliar, CCDC is a competition that puts student teams in charge of managing IT for a fictitious company as the network is undergoing a fundamental transformation. This year the challenge involved a common scenario: a merger. Ten finalist teams were tasked with managing IT infrastructure during this migrational period and, as an added bonus, the networks were simultaneously attacked by a group of red…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today