October 2, 2017 By Bob Stasio 2 min read

Over the past year, our industry has seen an explosion in artificial intelligence and cognitive solutions to assist with some of the most challenging cybersecurity problems. In some cases, cognitive solutions can increase analytical capability by 50 percent.

With cognitive technology providing such high efficiencies for security teams, people often ask me what is next for the human analyst. Will machines take over our roles in security? Given the estimated 1.8 million cybersecurity job gap by 2022, according to Frost & Sullivan, this topic is top of mind for most organizations.

A Glide Path to Cognitive Security Success

My advice to security professionals is to think about the bigger picture. Instead of a one-to-one replacement of man with machine, consider the cognitive security glide path. This concept shows that cognitive capabilities exist on a spectrum. You must constantly build to fight evolving cyberthreats.

When considering adopting cognitive solutions, security professionals should consider the following factors.

Cognitive Security Is a Journey, Not a Destination

There is a progressive level of capability when it comes to cognitive technology in security. The first function should be automating processes that are particularly manual and labor-intensive for humans.

A cognitive security solution should also scan data sources to look for anomalies, pointing analysts to the signal in the noise where they would not otherwise think to look. Finally, machine automation enables analysts to ask complex questions about the data generated by the cognitive solution to identify fraudsters trying to breach the network.

The Human Factor

The human analyst will continue to be very important in advanced cyber operations. The purpose of machine-driven cognitive capabilities is to automate many labor-intensive and time-consuming steps, essentially providing a high degree of efficiency to add as a multiplier to your cyber force — though it is not a force replacement. When most tier-one or tier-two tasks become automated, this allows room for your current staff to grow into tier-three analysts. This will give your security team the human touch, driving more complex searches of data to discover more advanced threats.

Understand the Kill Chain

The ultimate goal of implementing the cognitive glide path is to defeat the adversary kill chain. This methodology describes the way cybercriminals infiltrate a network in a series of steps, culminating in actions on the objective. At each point along the kill chain, your security organization should be thinking of how it can implement cognitive elements to detect indicators of malicious action, ultimately reducing the adversary dwell time. The faster you can detect threat actors, the more successful you will be at stopping advanced attacks. Cognitive capabilities can greatly accelerate this process.

Empowering Humans With Machine Intelligence

The cognitive glide path can improve the efficacy of a security organization facing a dynamic adversary. Advocates of such a strategy realize that cognitive assets must be rolled out as an iterative process, ultimately empowering the human analyst. This strategic view of the problem will result in more effective methods to control adversary access on your network.

Read the solution brief: Arm security analysts with the power of cognitive security

More from Artificial Intelligence

AI cybersecurity solutions detect ransomware in under 60 seconds

2 min read - Worried about ransomware? If so, it’s not surprising. According to the World Economic Forum, for large cyber losses (€1 million+), the number of cases in which data is exfiltrated is increasing, doubling from 40% in 2019 to almost 80% in 2022. And more recent activity is tracking even higher.Meanwhile, other dangers are appearing on the horizon. For example, the 2024 IBM X-Force Threat Intelligence Index states that threat group investment is increasingly focused on generative AI attack tools.Criminals have been…

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today