May 23, 2018 By Shane Schick 2 min read

Eighty-five percent of security professionals believe cybersecurity threats will lead to an attack on major critical infrastructure over the next five years, according to a recent survey. The annual Pwnie Express study, The Internet of Evil Things, polled approximately 500 security professionals about a range of cybersecurity threats, including malware and devices connected as part of the Internet of Things (IoT).

Cybersecurity vs. Online Evil

The research looked at the variety of industry sectors that might be least prepared for an attack. Health care topped the list at 51 percent — but was followed closely by the waste and wastewater sectors (47 percent) and the energy sector (43 percent).

Security professionals may be predicting major attacks on critical infrastructure because they’re already dealing with so many issues in their own organizations. Malware attacks affected 59 percent of those polled, for example. Additionally, 32 percent were impacted by ransomware. More serious cybersecurity threats — specifically distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks — struck 30 percent.

Security Professionals Still Lack the Right Tools

Perhaps more worryingly, security professionals suggested they aren’t necessarily strengthening their defenses — even after grappling directly with some of the most serious cybersecurity threats. While WannaCry affected 21 percent of those surveyed, for instance, approximately 18 percent said they still lack the tools to deal with the ransomware cryptoworm. Fourteen percent weren’t sure one way or the other. There were similar findings about other well-known malware and ransomware strains, including NotPetya, Locky and Mirai.

The gaps between the risks and the capability to deal with them weren’t limited to specific malware — it spread to entire areas of data protection. While a majority of 80 percent said they are concerned about cybersecurity threats as a result of bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies in the workplace, less than half said they had real-time monitoring tools for personal devices.

About the same percentage said they were worried about the risk inherent in IoT-connected smart devices, but only 23 percent claimed to be keeping track of such devices effectively. Overall, while 64 percent said they are more concerned about the security of connected devices than they were last year, the authors said there was no improvement in the frequency at which they’re checking them.

More from

The cybersecurity skills gap contributed to a $1.76 million increase in average breach costs

4 min read - Understaffing in cybersecurity — the "skills gap" — is driving up the cost of data breaches in recent years, according to a decade of reports by IBM.The 2024 IBM Data Breach Report found that more than half of breached organizations experienced severe security staffing shortages, a 26.2% increase from the previous year. They found this through a statistical analysis of the data gathered from in-depth interviews of more than 600 organizations that suffered data breaches in the prior year.The 2024…

Hive0147 serving juicy Picanha with a side of Mekotio

17 min read - IBM X-Force tracks multiple threat actors operating within the flourishing Latin American (LATAM) threat landscape. X-Force has observed Hive0147 to be one of the most active threat groups operating in the region, targeting employee inboxes at scale, with a primary focus on phishing and malware distribution. After a 3-month break, Hive0147 returned in July with even larger campaign volumes, and the debut of a new malicious downloader X-Force named "Picanha”, likely under continued development., deploying the Mekotio banking trojan. Hive0147…

Navigating the ethics of AI in cybersecurity

4 min read - Even if we’re not always consciously aware of it, artificial intelligence is now all around us. We’re already used to personalized recommendation systems in e-commerce, customer service chatbots powered by conversational AI and a whole lot more. In the realm of information security, we’ve already been relying on AI-powered spam filters for years to protect us from malicious emails.Those are all well-established use cases. However, since the meteoric rise of generative AI in the last few years, machines have become…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today