July 21, 2020 By David Bisson 3 min read

According to Bleeping Computer, Advanced Intel’s Vitali Kremez analyzed Conti and found ransomware based off the code for Ryuk, another crypto-malware family. He also discovered that Conti was using the same ransom note template that early versions of Ryuk employed in their attack campaigns. Finally, Kremez revealed that Conti appeared to be using the same TrickBot infrastructure as Ryuk for its ransomware attack campaigns.

The security researcher didn’t go as far to say that Conti was the direct successor to Ryuk. However, he did cite ID-Ransomware data as supporting evidence. He specifically pointed to the fact that submissions of Conti to the service had increased at a time when reports involving Ryuk were on the decline.

A Look Inside Conti’s Functionality

Carbon Black’s Threat Analysis Unit (TAU) researchers found a digital threat in Conti that in many ways behaved like a standard ransomware family. The sample they analyzed iterated files on the local system and on remote Server Message Block (SMB) network shares. Ultimately, it leveraged AES-256 via a hard-coded public key to perform its encryption routine.

But, TAU found some important characteristics that set Conti apart from other modern ransomware. First, researchers observed the ransomware family employs several different anti-analysis methods. These techniques include applying a string coding routine to nearly every string text of the malware. As a result, Conti hides the Windows APIs it needs to use for its infection chain.

Second, the ransomware arrives with command-line abilities that enables it to encrypt specific IP addresses. Such a capability imbues those in control of Conti with the power to conduct targeted attacks, while monitoring a victim’s network (Malicious actors could still use Conti to encrypt the entire local drive and SMB network shares automatically, however.). As such, the ransomware could use that tactic to reduce the “noise” of an infection, helping it to further foil analysts’ work.

Even so, the Conti sample observed by TAU was noisy in other ways. Indeed, researchers observed the ransomware using vssadmin to ensure the deletion of the Windows Shadow Volume Copies. This prevents a victim from restoring their data on their own. The analysts also witnessed the ransomware execute 146 individual commands designed to stop potential Windows commands before it proceeded with its encryption routine.

Last but not least, TAU discovered that Conti employed the Windows Restart Manager to unlock files to ensure they were open to encryption. In doing so, it ensured it could cause the maximum amount of damage.

The Significance of TrickBot to Ryuk (and Now Conti)

Ryuk’s relationship with TrickBot’s infrastructure goes back to the beginning of 2019. In April of that year, Cybereason reported on a “triple threat” infection chain in which a phishing campaign used a weaponized document to install Emotet. It’s at that point when Emotet downloaded TrickBot, malware that ultimately invoked its own downloader capabilities to drop a Ryuk payload on the infected machine.

More than a year later, researchers are still working to understand the relationship between TrickBot and Ryuk. SentinelOne revealed its own analysis of several attack campaigns involving both digital threats in June 2020. The security firm’s work uncovered that the attack operations waited approximately two weeks between the time of the initial TrickBot infection and the deployment of Ryuk.

How to Defend Against a Conti Ransomware Infection

Security professionals can help defend their organizations against a Conti ransomware infection by using relevance scoring to make their threat intelligence more actionable. This will ensure they’re paying attention to emerging threats, including Conti, that pose the greatest threat to their organizations. They can then use that intelligence to prioritize their security efforts accordingly. Given the evasive nature of Conti, security professionals should also ensure they have a robust data backup strategy so they can recover their files in the event of an infection.

More from

What does resilience in the cyber world look like in 2025 and beyond?

6 min read -  Back in 2021, we ran a series called “A Journey in Organizational Resilience.” These issues of this series remain applicable today and, in many cases, are more important than ever, given the rapid changes of the last few years. But the term "resilience" can be difficult to define, and when we define it, we may limit its scope, missing the big picture.In the age of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI), the prevalence of breach data from infostealers and the near-constant…

Airplane cybersecurity: Past, present, future

4 min read - With most aviation processes now digitized, airlines and the aviation industry as a whole must prioritize cybersecurity. If a cyber criminal launches an attack that affects a system involved in aviation — either an airline’s system or a third-party vendor — the entire process, from safety to passenger comfort, may be impacted.To improve security in the aviation industry, the FAA recently proposed new rules to tighten cybersecurity on airplanes. These rules would “protect the equipment, systems and networks of transport…

Protecting your digital assets from non-human identity attacks

4 min read - Untethered data accessibility and workflow automation are now foundational elements of most digital infrastructures. With the right applications and protocols in place, businesses no longer need to feel restricted by their lack of manpower or technical capabilities — machines are now filling those gaps.The use of non-human identities (NHIs) to power business-critical applications — especially those used in cloud computing environments or when facilitating service-to-service connections — has opened the doors for seamless operational efficiency. Unfortunately, these doors aren’t the…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today