An unfunded mandate is not a mandate. I believe that saying has its roots in federal government bureaucracy, but when it comes to information security, it certainly applies to businesses as well. There’s often a lot of talk about security initiatives, yet they go unfunded and, therefore, are left undone.

An Unfunded Mandate Leads to Problems

Take, for example, a security assessment that finds unsecured network shares and the personally identifiable information (PII) that’s at risk. Security staff can show that the PII is being accessed by people without a business need or, worse, staff members have no idea who is accessing the information, including untrusted outsiders. It’s a high-priority finding that must be corrected before the next audit cycle.

Management says fix it, but the IT and security personnel don’t have the proper tools to adequately implement the policy/fix enterprisewide, perhaps because there’s not enough money for a full-fledged data loss prevention system. So the risk remains. Business goes on.

Another example could be a known advanced malware infection. Intellectual property is seen being transferred out of the network and overseas. It’s acknowledged as a problem that needs to be fixed, but it’s not. Instead, it’s back-burnered to next year when the budget hopefully becomes available. The same goes for security information and event management (SIEM) systems, proper security testing, ongoing user training and the like. We have to do it, but it’ll never get done.

Excuses Abound

This very scenario plays out in the corporate world month after month, year after year. We’ve been told that we have to fix this or implement that to mitigate the risk, but we keep running into roadblocks. For instance:

  • Management’s not fully on board with providing the financial and political backing to roll this out because of a large acquisition that’s coming up.
  • There’s only one full-time person to handle these tasks. He or she is already overwhelmed, and we can’t justify hiring anyone else or paying to outsource the function altogether.
  • We have to wait until we upgrade our core network switches, move our application environment to the cloud, etc., and that project is on hold until the next budget cycle.
  • Our vendors are pushing back, saying that what we’re requesting is not supported, and we can’t afford to change vendors.

The size of the business and the industry in which it operates does not matter — there’s always an excuse. It almost always goes back to budget.

I call it lack of priorities. And we wonder why we keep getting hit.

Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is

Simply put, an unfunded security mandate is not a true security mandate. I think that in a lot of situations, people would be better off holding themselves to a lower standard of information security. Why require something or agree to fixing something if you know it won’t happen? You end up setting yourself up for failure.

In cases where funds are suddenly cut short on what were assumed to be funded mandates, what are you going to do? You need to have a fallback strategy — sort of an incident response plan to deal with being caught between a rock (a security risk/requirement) and a hard place (no resources to do it).

Can you use what you’ve got by leveraging tools already at your disposal? Can you better manage your time to take on a new task? Are there external resources that you could bring onboard to help at little to no cost, such as interns or co-op students? You need to address these concerns because this issue is going to come up.

Ask any given executive if information security is important and odds are good that everyone will say yes. It’s the actions done — or not done — behind the scenes that speak louder than their words.

More from CISO

Bringing threat intelligence and adversary insights to the forefront: X-Force Research Hub

3 min read - Today defenders are dealing with both a threat landscape that’s constantly changing and attacks that have stood the test of time. Innovation and best practices co-exist in the criminal world, and one mustn’t distract us from the other. IBM X-Force is continuously observing new attack vectors and novel malware in the wild, as adversaries seek to evade detection innovations. But we also know that tried and true tactics — from phishing and exploiting known vulnerabilities to using compromised credentials and…

What’s new in the 2023 Cost of a Data Breach report

3 min read - Data breach costs continue to grow, according to new research, reaching a record-high global average of $4.45 million, representing a 15% increase over three years. Costs in the healthcare industry continued to top the charts, as the most expensive industry for the 13th year in a row. Yet as breach costs continue to climb, the research points to new opportunities for containing breach costs. The research, conducted independently by Ponemon Institute and analyzed and published by IBM Security, constitutes the…

Cyber leaders: Stop being your own worst career enemy. Here’s how.

24 min read - Listen to this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you find your favorite audio content. We’ve been beating the cyber talent shortage drum for a while now, and with good reason. The vacancy numbers are staggering, with some in the industry reporting as many as 3.5 million unfilled positions as of April 2023 and projecting the disparity between supply and demand will remain until 2025. Perhaps one of the best (and arguably only) ways we can realistically bridge this gap is to…

Poor communication during a data breach can cost you — Here’s how to avoid it

5 min read - No one needs to tell you that data breaches are costly. That data has been quantified and the numbers are staggering. In fact, the IBM Security Cost of a Data Breach estimates that the average cost of a data breach in 2022 was $4.35 million, with 83% of organizations experiencing one or more security incidents. But what’s talked about less often (and we think should be talked about more) is how communication — both good and bad — factors into…