Cutting corners happens, more so in high-stakes, high-speed jobs. But from employees honest enough to admit when they push vulnerable code live, we can put together a portfolio of products shipped broken. A new study by Osterman Research found a concerning trend — 81% of developers admitted to knowingly pushing vulnerable code live. And that makes it easier for threat actors to launch cyberattacks.

But we’re not mentioning this just to be negative. Instead, it’s a good cue for businesses and agencies to look inward. Reducing supply chain vulnerability starts with creating the right company culture. Developers should feel safe raising a flag about vulnerable code, even if it means a possible missed deadline. Otherwise, the developer may stay silent and increase risk with the code. Employers can’t make a risk-based decision without knowing the full picture of possible vulnerabilities and the impact on incident response. This starts with a culture where cybersecurity is built into the fabric and is a top priority for everyone.

How Changing Company Culture Can Prevent Cyberattacks

However, a single person cannot solve the issue. Reducing supply chain cyberattacks requires teamwork — business leaders who set priorities, cybersecurity experts working closely with developers and developers building security into their code. Waiting until you are already the victim of a supply chain attack or a vulnerability exposes your data is too late.

Here are five keys to start proactively reducing supply chain attack risk:

Inform Developers About Cyberattacks

For supply chain attacks, developers are the front line. You may be tempted to try to cover all your bases with a yearly class or more frequent lectures. However, what really works best is a process where developers are updated on an ongoing basis about new cyberattacks and best practices. By using micro-training, such as text training or short videos, developers can both get the lessons they need and increase their awareness.

Monitor Open-Source Projects

The 2020 State of the Software Supply Chain Report found that cyberattacks on open-source code increased 430% between 2019 and 2020. By using adversary simulation engagements, organizations can get a firsthand look at how well their software holds up during an attack. Developers can also reduce the risk posed by open-source development by reducing dependency confusion issues by increasing the visibility and security of libraries, packages and dependencies.

Zero Trust

Because of the moving parts — data, products, integrations — a zero trust approach is crucial for reducing supply chain cyberattack risk. Assume that any device, user or data isn’t safe until proven otherwise. This way, you can often reduce, and remove, threats that can harm the supply chain.

Built-In Data Protection

A key vulnerability with supply chain cyberattacks is sensitive data in the applications, which must flow both ways. In addition, make sure you’re following all data privacy and protection laws in your code. Developers should build the latest encryption techniques into their applications. They should also use digital signatures, session breaks and multifactor authentication for supply chain.

Focus on Third-Party Risks 

The nature of supply chain is that organizations and applications work together for delivery. That might be through physical products or software security. However, each new connection means more high-risk endpoints. Be sure to double check all integrations and risk. After all, you can’t protect what you don’t know. The next step is working together with vendors and partners to make sure that all parties are following cybersecurity best practices and being up front about risks.

Supply chain attacks are not likely to subside anytime in the near future. By building resilience to this type of damaging cyberattack into your applications and culture, you can reduce your risk.

More from Incident Response

Alert fatigue: A 911 cyber call center that never sleeps

4 min read - Imagine running a 911 call center where the switchboard is constantly lit up with incoming calls. The initial question, “What’s your emergency, please?” aims to funnel the event to the right responder for triage and assessment. Over the course of your shift, requests could range from soft-spoken “I’m having a heart attack” pleas to “Where’s my pizza?” freak-outs eating up important resources. Now add into the mix a volume of calls that burnout kicks in and important threats are missed.…

SIEM and SOAR in 2023: Key trends and new changes

4 min read - Security information and event management (SIEM) systems remain a key component of security operations centers (SOCs). Security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) frameworks, meanwhile, have emerged to fill the gap in these capabilities left by many SIEM systems. But as many companies have begun reaching the limits of SIEM and SOAR systems over the last few years, they have started turning to other solutions such as extended detection and response (XDR). But does this shift spell the end of SIEM…

X-Force releases detection & response framework for managed file transfer software

5 min read - How AI can help defenders scale detection guidance for enterprise software tools If we look back at mass exploitation events that shook the security industry like Log4j, Atlassian, and Microsoft Exchange when these solutions were actively being exploited by attackers, the exploits may have been associated with a different CVE, but the detection and response guidance being released by the various security vendors had many similarities (e.g., Log4shell vs. Log4j2 vs. MOVEit vs. Spring4Shell vs. Microsoft Exchange vs. ProxyShell vs.…

Unmasking hypnotized AI: The hidden risks of large language models

11 min read - The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) is redefining how cybersecurity teams and cybercriminals operate. As security teams leverage the capabilities of generative AI to bring more simplicity and speed into their operations, it's important we recognize that cybercriminals are seeking the same benefits. LLMs are a new type of attack surface poised to make certain types of attacks easier, more cost-effective, and even more persistent. In a bid to explore security risks posed by these innovations, we attempted to…