This is the second blog in a series about zero trust.

Lack of requisite budget can be a major roadblock when it comes to adding a zero trust model. Why is this so much of a problem? And, how can a SOC team make the C-suite see how zero trust helps the business?

In the first blog in this series, How Zero Trust Can Help Close the Cybersecurity Skills Gap, I examined a poll conducted by Deloitte that identified four obstacles to putting a zero trust framework in place. The biggest challenge was a lack of skilled workers. Luckily, this can be fixed with a carefully selected vendor solution.

The next step is getting the budget you need.

Weighing the Numbers When Choosing a Zero Trust Model

More than a quarter (28.1%) of respondents to Deloitte’s poll said that budget was a problem. Similarly, 45% of participants in a survey conducted during RSA Conference 2020 stated small budgets were their top challenge in being able to try out new tactics like zero trust.

These small budgets appear to be tied to leaders’ doubts about the security budgeting process in general. More than half (55%) of security and technology executives tell PwC that they intended to increase their security budgets in 2021. However, the same percentage of respondents say their employers’ digital security spending didn’t match the most important risks. The same proportion of executives doubted their digital security budgets could provide the best return on investment or handle an attack.

Learn more on zero trust

Finding the Right Approach

These misgivings don’t outright block zero trust. Rather, they invite security leaders to rethink their approach to obtaining their budget.

In order to start on the right foot, security personnel need to speak their language. The C-suite might not understand digital security risk well. Their technical expertise might be limited. They might, therefore, be hesitant to approve a project if they don’t understand what’s being proposed.

Knowing this, security experts might consider reframing their dialogue with executives in terms of business risk. They can specifically speak to how a policy of ‘trust by default’ opens up the possibility of attackers affecting mission-critical operations and profits. They can then set this in contrast to a zero trust model, which supports business objectives.

Next, security leaders can discuss a plan for using a zero trust model. They might consider staying away from changing the entire network over a short period of time. The C-suite wants to make sure that their budget decisions will bring value to the group, after all. A good compromise might be a pilot program for using zero trust within a specific part of the network.

The security team can use that engagement to track what worked and what didn’t, as well as to demonstrate the value of zero trust. If this works, executives might be much more willing to expand zero trust across the whole system.

You can also foster that connection by using benchmarks, visuals and other metrics that are easy to understand from a business perspective. For example, you might demonstrate the time and money saved on not resetting users’ credentials so often because of the implementation of single sign-on (SSO) and other security controls that complement zero trust.

Gaining Support for a Zero Trust Model

You won’t succeed in putting zero trust in place without the requisite budget or support. You have a vested interest in making sure leadership understands what’s going on every step of the way. Speaking the language of business, pilot programs and simple metrics, you can foster a culture of zero trust together with the C-Suite, all while retaining the money you need to fulfill your employer’s security needs.

More from Zero Trust

Why Zero Trust Works When Everything Else Doesn’t

The zero trust security model is proving to be one of the most effective cybersecurity approaches ever conceived. Zero trust — also called zero trust architecture (ZTA), zero trust network architecture (ZTNA) and perimeter-less security — takes a "default deny" security posture. All people and devices must prove explicit permission to use each network resource each time they use that resource. Using microsegmentation and least privileged access principles, zero trust not only prevents breaches but also stymies lateral movement should a breach…

What to Know About the Pentagon’s New Push for Zero Trust

The Pentagon is taking cybersecurity to the next level — and they’re helping organizations of all kinds do the same. Here’s how the U.S. Department of Defense is implementing zero trust and why this matters to all businesses and organizations. But first, let’s review this zero trust business. What is Zero Trust? Zero trust is the most important cybersecurity idea in a generation. But “zero trust” is itself a bit of a misnomer. It’s not about whether a person or…

Effectively Enforce a Least Privilege Strategy

Every security officer wants to minimize their attack surface. One of the best ways to do this is by implementing a least privilege strategy. One report revealed that data breaches from insiders could cost as much as 20% of annual revenue. Also, at least one in three reported data breaches involve an insider. Over 78% of insider data breaches involve unintentional data loss or exposure. Least privilege protocols can help prevent these kinds of blunders. Clearly, proper management of access…

What CISOs Want to See From NIST’s Impending Zero Trust Guidelines

Cybersecurity at U.S. federal agencies has been running behind the times for years. It took an executive order by President Joe Biden to kickstart a fix across the agencies. The government initiative also serves as a wake-up call to enterprises lagging in getting zero trust up and running. Several organizations, including the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) responded to the president’s order with detailed…