When it comes to reducing security breach costs, companies with security artificial intelligence (AI) and automation can save millions, per a new report.

According to the most recent IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, organizations with fully deployed security AI and automation save $3.05 million per data breach compared to those without. That’s a 65.2% difference in average breach cost.

As cyber threats increase and change, the stakes could not be higher. Eventuality preparedness has become more important than ever. AI and automation are critical components of this new security landscape.

Why Security Automation Matters

Security automation is about using tools that augment or replace human oversight to find and contain incidents and breach attempts. At their core, these tools rely on AI, machine learning, analytics and automated security orchestration.

Cyber gangs are also busy at work creating more refined tactics, often backed by hefty private or state funding. In the near future, AI-powered cyberattacks will only become more common. Meanwhile, security teams are short-staffed. With the increased use of cloud computing and third-party providers, attack surfaces are very hard to define, let alone secure by the usual means.

Due to these pressures, more businesses and agencies are turning to AI and automation for cybersecurity. As per the report, fully-deployed security AI and automation increased by 10 percentage points, from 21% to 31%, between 2020 and 2022.

Read the Report

Average Time to Identify and Contain a Breach

The real-world benefit of security AI and automation reveals itself in the average time to identify and contain a data breach. Groups with fully deployed strategies detect and contain a breach much faster compared to their less-prepared counterparts. According to the report, the difference in average breach response times was:

  • Fully deployed: 181 days to identify and 68 days to contain (249-day total life cycle)
  • Partially deployed: 223 days to identify and 76 days to contain (299 days total)
  • Not deployed: 235 days to identify and 88 days to contain (323 days total)

Overall, it took 74 days longer for those with no security AI and automation to identify and contain a data breach compared to companies with fully deployed strategies. That’s a long time for intruders to be roaming around your networks.

Eventuality Preparedness

Today, security experts tend to believe it’s impossible to prevent intrusions 100% of the time. For that reason, they place added emphasis on post-incident recovery while maintaining robust prevention efforts. Much like natural disaster preparedness, a well-developed recovery plan is essential.

Beyond business damage, threat actors can hurt health and human well-being. Attacks on operational technology and infrastructure have increased. Now, there are calls for cybersecurity to be part and parcel of emergency management. FEMA’s Comprehensive Preparedness Guide, CPG 101, highlights this, pointing out “technological” hazards (events or emergencies involving manmade materials).

AI Adopters Lead the Way

When it comes to cyber defense, tech is still a double-edged sword. As soon as the digital password came into being, it could be broken. Today, with the cloud and Internet of Things devices in play, digital work drives value but also creates new risks.

The AI adopters have paired AI systems with human knowledge to extend visibility and protection across an expanding digital landscape of servers, apps, cloud connections and endpoints. In fact, 35% rank endpoint discovery and asset management as one of their top AI use cases now. In three years, it’s predicted that usage will increase to almost 50%.

Across every industry, cybersecurity leaders must adopt a more defensive, proactive posture for protecting core functions. Automation can help do that.

More from Data Protection

Heads Up CEO! Cyber Risk Influences Company Credit Ratings

4 min read - More than ever, cybersecurity strategy is a core part of business strategy. For example, a company’s cyber risk can directly impact its credit rating. Credit rating agencies continuously strive to gain a better understanding of the risks that companies face. Today, those agencies increasingly incorporate cybersecurity into their credit assessments. This allows agencies to evaluate a company’s capacity to repay borrowed funds by factoring in the risk of cyberattacks. Getting Hacked Impacts Credit Scoring As per the Wall Street Journal…

4 min read

IBM Security Guardium Ranked as a Leader in the Data Security Platforms Market

3 min read - KuppingerCole named IBM Security Guardium as an overall leader in their Leadership Compass on Data Security Platforms. IBM was ranked as a leader in all three major categories: Product, Innovation, and Market. With this in mind, let’s examine how KuppingerCole measures today’s solutions and why it’s important for you to have a data security platform that you trust. The Transformation of the Data Security Industry As digital transformation continues to expand, the impact it has had on enterprises is very apparent when…

3 min read

SaaS vs. On-Prem Data Security: Which is Right for You?

2 min read - As businesses increasingly rely on digital data storage and communication, the need for effective data security solutions has become apparent. These solutions can help prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data, detect and respond to security threats and ensure compliance with relevant regulations and standards. However, not all data security solutions are created equal. Are you choosing the right solution for your organization? That answer depends on various factors, such as your industry, size and specific security needs. SaaS vs. On-Premises…

2 min read

Understanding the Backdoor Debate in Cybersecurity

3 min read - The debate over whether backdoor encryption should be implemented to aid law enforcement has been contentious for years. On one side of the fence, the proponents of backdoors argue that they could provide valuable intelligence and help law enforcement investigate criminals or prevent terrorist attacks. On the other side, opponents contend they would weaken overall security and create opportunities for malicious actors to exploit. So which side of the argument is correct? As with most debates, the answer isn't so…

3 min read