August 10, 2022 By Jonathan Reed 2 min read

When it comes to reducing security breach costs, companies with security artificial intelligence (AI) and automation can save millions, per a new report.

According to the most recent IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, organizations with fully deployed security AI and automation save $3.05 million per data breach compared to those without. That’s a 65.2% difference in average breach cost.

As cyber threats increase and change, the stakes could not be higher. Eventuality preparedness has become more important than ever. AI and automation are critical components of this new security landscape.

Why security automation matters

Security automation is about using tools that augment or replace human oversight to find and contain incidents and breach attempts. At their core, these tools rely on AI, machine learning, analytics and automated security orchestration.

Cyber gangs are also busy at work creating more refined tactics, often backed by hefty private or state funding. In the near future, AI-powered cyberattacks will only become more common. Meanwhile, security teams are short-staffed. With the increased use of cloud computing and third-party providers, attack surfaces are very hard to define, let alone secure by the usual means.

Due to these pressures, more businesses and agencies are turning to AI and automation for cybersecurity. As per the report, fully-deployed security AI and automation increased by 10 percentage points, from 21% to 31%, between 2020 and 2022.

Read the Report

Average time to identify and contain a breach

The real-world benefit of security AI and automation reveals itself in the average time to identify and contain a data breach. Groups with fully deployed strategies detect and contain a breach much faster compared to their less-prepared counterparts. According to the report, the difference in average breach response times was:

  • Fully deployed: 181 days to identify and 68 days to contain (249-day total life cycle)
  • Partially deployed: 223 days to identify and 76 days to contain (299 days total)
  • Not deployed: 235 days to identify and 88 days to contain (323 days total)

Overall, it took 74 days longer for those with no security AI and automation to identify and contain a data breach compared to companies with fully deployed strategies. That’s a long time for intruders to be roaming around your networks.

Eventuality preparedness

Today, security experts tend to believe it’s impossible to prevent intrusions 100% of the time. For that reason, they place added emphasis on post-incident recovery while maintaining robust prevention efforts. Much like natural disaster preparedness, a well-developed recovery plan is essential.

Beyond business damage, threat actors can hurt health and human well-being. Attacks on operational technology and infrastructure have increased. Now, there are calls for cybersecurity to be part and parcel of emergency management. FEMA’s Comprehensive Preparedness Guide, CPG 101, highlights this, pointing out “technological” hazards (events or emergencies involving manmade materials).

AI adopters lead the way

When it comes to cyber defense, tech is still a double-edged sword. As soon as the digital password came into being, it could be broken. Today, with the cloud and Internet of Things devices in play, digital work drives value but also creates new risks.

The AI adopters have paired AI systems with human knowledge to extend visibility and protection across an expanding digital landscape of servers, apps, cloud connections and endpoints. In fact, 35% rank endpoint discovery and asset management as one of their top AI use cases now. In three years, it’s predicted that usage will increase to almost 50%.

Across every industry, cybersecurity leaders must adopt a more defensive, proactive posture for protecting core functions. Automation can help do that.

More from Data Protection

Data residency: What is it and why it is important?

3 min read - Data residency is a hot topic, especially for cloud data. The reason is multi-faceted, but the focus has been driven by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which governs information privacy in the European Union and the European Economic Area.The GDPR defines the requirement that users’ personal data and privacy be adequately protected by organizations that gather, process and store that data. After the GDPR rolled out, other countries such as Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, South Africa and the UAE…

Third-party breaches hit 90% of top global energy companies

3 min read - A new report from SecurityScorecard reveals a startling trend among the world’s top energy companies, with 90% suffering from data breaches through third parties over the last year. This statistic is particularly concerning given the crucial function these companies serve in everyday life.Their increased dependence on digital systems facilitates the increase in attacks on infrastructure networks. This sheds light on the need for these energy companies to adopt a proactive approach to securing their networks and customer information.2023 industry recap:…

Data security posture management vs cloud security posture management

4 min read - “A data breach has just occurred”, is a phrase no security professional wants to hear. From the CISO on down to the SOC analysts, a data breach is the definition of a very bad day. It can cause serious brand damage and financial loss for enterprises, lead to abrupt career changes among security professionals, and instill fear of financial or privacy loss for businesses and consumers.According to an ESG report, 55% of data and workloads currently run or operate in…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today