Most organizations take what you might call an active approach to cybersecurity, They’re prepared to do certain things once an attack happens. Or, they take a reactive approach, taking action after an attack is completed. A proactive cybersecurity strategy is about acting before any attack occurs; it’s a good cybersecurity posture of readiness.

Take a look at the policies, tools and practices that make up proactive cybersecurity measures.

Proactive Versus Reactive and Active Review

The creation and review of security tools, protocols, policies and practices are far too often a set-it-and-forget-it process. Yet the world is constantly changing. A proactive approach is to constantly review all this with an eye toward emerging threats, new tools and new ideas, updating everything frequently. The same goes for training. You should actively review the ‘curriculum’ for cybersecurity awareness and related employee training at least quarterly.

Ethical Hacking

Instead of waiting for an attack, it’s best to do the hacking yourself. Certified ethical hackers can probe your defenses, hunting for vulnerabilities and defensive weaknesses. These offensive security researchers use the same methods and tools as malicious attackers. Red team/blue team exercises, penetration testing and other simulations enable your people to learn from cyberattacks without really being attacked.

Automate Intelligence

Use tools that create insights into what’s happening on your networks and respond automatically. The proactive approach means that you have as many fixes as possible already locked and loaded. Intelligent software hunts 24/7 for breaches and odd behavior, ready to isolate and fix when something does happen. This is offense rather than defense.

Zero Trust

Using the active approach, you can lock the doors when your system detects intruders. But with the proactive approach, you can lock the doors before they arrive.

Zero trust strives to verify and authorize every device, app and user attempting to access every resource.

For attackers, even if they can steal a password, they still find the doors locked because they don’t have an authorized device. This proactive locking of doors through the zero trust model is even more important while so many remote workers use home offices. They use equipment in spaces with unknown physical security and over networks of unknown quality.

A zero trust model is dynamic, calling on you to monitor, learn and adapt on an ongoing — proactive — basis.

Proactive Versus Reactive in Endpoint Monitoring

Proactive security means proactive endpoint monitoring. With the spread of internet of things devices, cloud infrastructure and remote work devices it’s more important than ever. Automate endpoint monitoring to maximize the local security of each device.

Indicators of Behavior

Active and reactive cybersecurity call for looking for indicators of compromise — the signs that indicate a breach has occurred and a cyber crime has been committed. But proactive cybersecurity looks for indicators of behavior (IoB), a collection of the actions users take.

For example, it might spot someone downloading business data to an external storage device, or uploading code to an unknown cloud service. An IoB might be a change in permissions or the switching of a person’s network on a desktop PC from the internal Wi-Fi to a mobile broadband hotspot. By collecting hundreds or thousands of these, it’s possible to construct a clearer picture of where the organization is vulnerable from a behavioral point of view. It can also make changes with minimal disruption. For example, you can get ready for a decision to disable thumb drive connectivity proactively by preparing the users who use thumb drives to find more secure options in advance. It can also isolate specific devices or endpoints to monitor closely when employee behavior puts them at risk.

Proactive Versus Reactive Is a Mindset

Proactive cybersecurity is a broad, overall approach. It involves not only specific methods and practices, but also a mindset of offensive cybersecurity.

After all, why wait until you’re attacked? Instead, you can act now and prevent the attack from ever happening.

More from Data Protection

Cost of a data breach 2023: Pharmaceutical industry impacts

3 min read - Data breaches are both commonplace and costly in the medical industry.  Two industry verticals that fall under the medical umbrella — healthcare and pharmaceuticals — sit at the top of the list of the highest average cost of a data breach, according to IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023. The health industry’s place at the top spot of most costly data breaches is probably not a surprise. With its sensitive and valuable data assets, it is one of…

Cost of a data breach 2023: Financial industry impacts

3 min read - According to the IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023, the global average cost of a data breach in 2023 was $4.45 million, 15% more than in 2020. In response, 51% of organizations plan to increase cybersecurity spending this year. For the financial industry, however, global statistics don’t tell the whole story. Finance firms lose approximately $5.9 million per data breach, 28% higher than the global average. In addition, evolving regulatory concerns play a role in how financial companies…

Advanced analytics can help detect insider threats rapidly

2 min read - While external cyber threats capture headlines, the rise of insider threats from within an organization is a growing concern. In 2023, the average cost of a data breach caused by an insider reached $4.90 million, 9.6% higher than the global average data breach cost of $4.45 million. To effectively combat this danger, integrating advanced analytics into data security software has become a critical and proactive defense strategy. Understanding insider threats Insider threats come from users who abuse authorized access to…

One simple way to cut ransomware recovery costs in half

4 min read - Whichever way you look at the data, it is considerably cheaper to use backups to recover from a ransomware attack than to pay the ransom. The median recovery cost for those that use backups is half the cost incurred by those that paid the ransom, according to a recent study. Similarly, the mean recovery cost is almost $1 million lower for those that used backups. Despite this fact, the use of backups is actually falling. This was one of the…