October 28, 2016 By Fran Howarth 2 min read

Black Hat Europe 2016 is almost upon us. The event offers technical training and briefings to showcase the newest research and disclose the latest vulnerabilities. Many of these vulnerabilities are uncovered by penetration testing, and Black Hate Europe 2016 offers four interesting training sessions on that subject.

Sharing Is Caring

It is especially important to share information regarding security vulnerabilities. This was a key focus at the recent Black Hat USA conference and will likely be much discussed at Black Hat Europe 2016. During the keynote speech in the U.S., Dan Kaminsky of White Ops urged the public and private sectors to work together to deal with cyberthreats faster and more efficiently. According to Kaminsky, information sharing is essential to this effort.

Hackers and security researchers have been attempting to share information and warn of vulnerabilities that put systems at risk, but they were often ignored or even threatened with lawsuits. As security breaches became everyday news, however, cybercriminals realized they could potentially fetch millions of dollars in exchange for vulnerability information on the black market. Some of this information has even been sold to governments.

On the other hand, organizations and technology vendors realized they can benefit from the work of outside security researchers. They began to warm to the idea of rewarding these individuals to encourage ethical disclosure whereby the information is not made public until after the company that received a warning has time to fix the problem.

Bug Bounties Bring Big Bucks

Nowadays, many organizations run bug bounty programs, offering a wide variety of incentives for security researchers to disclose vulnerabilities, including some new programs announced at Black Hat USA. Perhaps more will be announced during Black Hat Europe 2016 in response to new vulnerabilities to be announced.

Since it launched its bug bounty program in 2011, Facebook has awarded more than $4.3 million to more than 800 researchers. As many as 210 researchers were awarded $936,000 in 2015 alone, with payouts averaging $1,780.

According to the “2016 Bug Bounty Hacker Report” from HackerOne, 57 percent of hackers who participated in bug bounty programs have not received payments for their efforts. Just over half are making less than $20,000 for their hacking activities and only 6 percent report earning more than $100,000. However, 45 percent have full-time salaried employment.

Learn More at Black Hat Europe 2016

With rewards as low as they are in most cases, can hacking be considered to be entrepreneurial? Is there such a thing as making a living out of ethical hacking? Rewards tend to be based on the bug’s potential risk and criticality, rising rapidly when a really dangerous threat is found, regardless of the level of effort required to discover it.

So it seems that bug hunting itself is a risky business. An ethical hacker or researcher is not sure to find anything and may be left with slim pickings. Some of the largest rewards offered are never paid out, and those at the highest end of the scale are relatively rare. To encourage entrepreneurial hacking for the greater good, a culture of security information sharing should be encouraged and rewards made widespread. Black Hat Europe 2016 is a great forum for doing just that.

More from Risk Management

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

Crisis communication: What NOT to do

4 min read - Read the 1st blog in this series, Cybersecurity crisis communication: What to doWhen an organization experiences a cyberattack, tensions are high, customers are concerned and the business is typically not operating at full capacity. Every move you make at this point makes a difference to your company’s future, and even a seemingly small mistake can cause permanent reputational damage.Because of the stress and many moving parts that are involved, businesses often fall short when it comes to communication in a crisis.…

Digital solidarity vs. digital sovereignty: Which side are you on?

4 min read - The landscape of international cyber policy continues to evolve rapidly, reflecting the dynamic nature of technology and global geopolitics. Central to this evolution are two competing concepts: digital solidarity and digital sovereignty.The U.S. Department of State, through its newly released International Cyberspace and Digital Policy Strategy, has articulated a clear preference for digital solidarity, positioning it as a counterpoint to the protectionist approach of digital sovereignty.What are the main differences between these two concepts, and why does it matter? Let’s…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today