It’s a much-held misconception that all hackers are bad, when in actuality the word hacker doesn’t specifically refer to criminals, bad guys or anything in between. Rather, it is just a word open to subjective interpretation. For ease of labeling, tech writers often refer to three types of hackers: black hats, white hats and gray hats. Just like in a Western film, these terms define the different behavioral groups.

Hackers Wear Different Hats

Black hats are the cybercriminals who perform illegal activities for personal gain. They’re the bad guys — the Liberty Valances and Ben Wades of the Western scene.

Then you have the white hats. These are our heroes; John Wayne, Nathan Brittle and Wyatt Earp are classic examples. In security terms, these are the computer security pros who specialize in penetration testing and other methodologies to ensure the security of an organization’s information systems.

Finally, we have the gray hats. Few things fit cleanly into black and white categories, often leaving gray areas; the gray hats fall somewhere in between the good guys and the bad guys. While they don’t work for their own personal gain or to cause specific digital carnage, they may commit crimes or do arguably unethical things in the pursuit of good. If you were to pick a Western character that best fits this description, it would probably be Doc Holliday in “Tombstone.” He’s ultimately a good guy, but has some questionable morals and approaches.

Download the white paper: Combat security attacks with global threat intelligence

Black Hats Aren’t Afraid of Teamwork

The state of play in the cybersecurity space is as recognizable as any good Western plot: All the most ruthlessly capable seem to collaborate and communicate far more effectively than the sheriff’s deputies or the good guys. This is exactly the same as in cyberspace.

The increasingly ubiquitous nature of the Dark Web has given cybercriminals the platform to contact and collaborate with each other far more frequently and easily than ever before. It is now essentially a safe environment for them. In fact, it’s so free from the threat of legal prosecution that it is rapidly turning into a social forum for black-hat best practices and knowledge sharing.

Black hats are collaborating far more than the white hats, and it has reached a point where their collaboration has gone beyond mere understating and communication. They are now actually providing a virtual supply chain for all manner of digital malice.

The solution for organizations and the white hat community is a simple one, directly inspired by the activities of the black hat community: collaboration and transparency. Due to the nature of cybersecurity, however, the notion of transparency and collaboration has been slow to garner support and gather pace.

These two words are not areas that, until recently, have been associated with cybersecurity best practice. After all, the notion of security in general would tend to lend itself to the very opposite of the two. But this is not so.

The White Hats Must Collaborate

The creation of the X-Force Exchange platform has opened up a new opportunity for tackling cybercrime. This collaborative, cloud-based platform provides access to volumes of actionable IBM and third-party threat data from across the globe, including real-time indicators of live attacks, which can be used to defend against cybercrime.

Just like in “Tombstone” when the Earp posse ride together (with a little help from Doc Holliday) as one, so, too, will the X-Force Exchange give organizations and the white-hat community the opportunity to unite and, with collective strength, strike back at the black hats.

Organizations are able to directly interact with security analysts and researchers, as well as their industry peers, via the platform. This collaboration will help validate findings and expose enterprises to similar companies also fighting cybercrime.

The transparent use of real-time information is critical to the battle against cybercrime. Thanks to X-Force Exchange, white hats can use the very same tactics employed by their enemies to actually bring about a positive effect.

Overcoming long-held dogma in the cybersecurity space will not be instantaneous. After many years of practiced doctrine around isolation and tall (fire) walls, collaboration and transparency will take time for organizations to adapt to. But turning the weapons and approaches used by the black hats against them may well prove a watershed moment in the fight against cybercrime.

Sign up for a free trial of the IBM X-Force Exchange

More from Threat Intelligence

Charles Henderson’s Cybersecurity Awareness Month Content Roundup

In some parts of the world during October, we have Halloween, which conjures the specter of imagined monsters lurking in the dark. Simultaneously, October is Cybersecurity Awareness Month, which evokes the specter of threats lurking behind our screens. Bombarded with horror stories about data breaches, ransomware, and malware, everyone’s suddenly in the latest cybersecurity trends and data, and the intricacies of their organization’s incident response plan. What does all this fear and uncertainty stem from? It’s the unknowns. Who might…

Old Habits Die Hard: New Report Finds Businesses Still Introducing Security Risk into Cloud Environments

While cloud computing and its many forms (private, public, hybrid cloud or multi-cloud environments) have become ubiquitous with innovation and growth over the past decade, cybercriminals have closely watched the migration and introduced innovations of their own to exploit the platforms. Most of these exploits are based on poor configurations and human error. New IBM Security X-Force data reveals that many cloud-adopting businesses are falling behind on basic security best practices, introducing more risk to their organizations. Shedding light on…

Raspberry Robin and Dridex: Two Birds of a Feather

IBM Security Managed Detection and Response (MDR) observations coupled with IBM Security X-Force malware research sheds additional light on the mysterious objectives of the operators behind the Raspberry Robin worm. Based on a comparative analysis between a downloaded Raspberry Robin DLL and a Dridex malware loader, the results show that they are similar in structure and functionality. Thus, IBM Security research draws another link between the Raspberry Robin infections and the Russia-based cybercriminal group 'Evil Corp,' which is the same…

From Ramnit To Bumblebee (via NeverQuest): Similarities and Code Overlap Shed Light On Relationships Between Malware Developers

A comparative analysis performed by IBM Security X-Force uncovered evidence that suggests Bumblebee malware, which first appeared in the wild last year, was likely developed directly from source code associated with the Ramnit banking trojan. This newly discovered connection is particularly interesting as campaign activity has so far linked Bumblebee to affiliates of the threat group ITG23 (aka the Trickbot/Conti group), who are not known to have had a previous connection with Ramnit. This year has so far proven tumultuous…