Cybercriminals are learning how to use newer authentication methods to exploit security weaknesses. As always, it is a cat-and-mouse game with serious consequences.

Facial recognition software can be exploited with high-definition photos, many of which can be found on social media accounts. Fraudsters can easily bypass one-time passwords by calling cellphone companies and impersonating the account owner.

Exploiting Weak Links

Mixed in with all these advanced techniques are old favorites, such as simple social engineering. In the attack known as Dyre Wolf, for example, criminals tricked banking staffers into initiating wire transfers by calling a phone number and convincing them to give up their passwords.

Authentication can be a security program’s weak link, and enhancing the encryption and key sizes won’t fix the problem. Neither will adding multiple factors to the authentication process, since the security of the feature really depends on the habits of those who use it.

The situation is so serious that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued recommendations on how and when to apply multifactor authentication earlier this summer. IT managers need to carefully consider these advanced authentication methods and understand what is really an additional factor and what is merely something that can be easily compromised, reproduced or otherwise stolen.

The Next Wave of Authentication Methods

Biometric-based authentication methods represent the most promising solution. But even these can be compromised or implemented poorly. One early fingerprint sensor was defeated by a very high-quality 3-D printed copy, for example. Iris scanners have also been duped by high-resolution photographs.

More sophistication is needed in this area. The combination of voice recognition with statistical sampling of keystroke cadence and mouse movements, for example, may be able to fool cybercriminals into thinking the real user is behind the authentication request. There are other trends worth examining as well, such as better use of fingerprint readers on smartphones, more sophisticated hardware tokens, and better risk-based authentication and single sign-on integration with authentication methods.

Security researchers are developing these technologies in an effort to keep a pace or two ahead of cybercriminals. They are also looking at ways to embed smarter hardware tokens that have encryption keys or encryption engines inside their apps to make them harder for malicious actors to crack. Until those tools arrive, however, it’s up to users to apply better habits and protect themselves — and their data.

More from Identity & Access

Another category? Why we need ITDR

5 min read - Technologists are understandably suffering from category fatigue. This fatigue can be more pronounced within security than in any other sub-sector of IT. Do the use cases and risks of today warrant identity threat detection and response (ITDR)? To address this question, we work backwards from the vulnerabilities, threats, misconfigurations and attacks that IDTR specializes in providing visibility into. As identity threat detection and response (ITDR) technology evolves, one of the most common queries we get is: “Why do we need…

Access control is going mobile — Is this the way forward?

2 min read - Last year, the highest volume of cyberattacks (30%) started in the same way: a cyber criminal using valid credentials to gain access. Even more concerning, the X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2024 found that this method of attack increased by 71% from 2022. Researchers also discovered a 266% increase in infostealers to obtain credentials to use in an attack. Family members of privileged users are also sometimes victims.“These shifts suggest that threat actors have revalued credentials as a reliable and preferred…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today