Cybercriminals Are Getting Better at Using Advanced Authentication Methods
Cybercriminals are learning how to use newer authentication methods to exploit security weaknesses. As always, it is a cat-and-mouse game with serious consequences.
Facial recognition software can be exploited with high-definition photos, many of which can be found on social media accounts. Fraudsters can easily bypass one-time passwords by calling cellphone companies and impersonating the account owner.
Exploiting Weak Links
Mixed in with all these advanced techniques are old favorites, such as simple social engineering. In the attack known as Dyre Wolf, for example, criminals tricked banking staffers into initiating wire transfers by calling a phone number and convincing them to give up their passwords.
Authentication can be a security program’s weak link, and enhancing the encryption and key sizes won’t fix the problem. Neither will adding multiple factors to the authentication process, since the security of the feature really depends on the habits of those who use it.
The situation is so serious that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued recommendations on how and when to apply multifactor authentication earlier this summer. IT managers need to carefully consider these advanced authentication methods and understand what is really an additional factor and what is merely something that can be easily compromised, reproduced or otherwise stolen.
The Next Wave of Authentication Methods
Biometric-based authentication methods represent the most promising solution. But even these can be compromised or implemented poorly. One early fingerprint sensor was defeated by a very high-quality 3-D printed copy, for example. Iris scanners have also been duped by high-resolution photographs.
More sophistication is needed in this area. The combination of voice recognition with statistical sampling of keystroke cadence and mouse movements, for example, may be able to fool cybercriminals into thinking the real user is behind the authentication request. There are other trends worth examining as well, such as better use of fingerprint readers on smartphones, more sophisticated hardware tokens, and better risk-based authentication and single sign-on integration with authentication methods.
Security researchers are developing these technologies in an effort to keep a pace or two ahead of cybercriminals. They are also looking at ways to embed smarter hardware tokens that have encryption keys or encryption engines inside their apps to make them harder for malicious actors to crack. Until those tools arrive, however, it’s up to users to apply better habits and protect themselves — and their data.