The idea that your company has nothing of interest or worth stealing — let alone something that falls in the category of economic espionage — is a myth. Additionally, your employees may have been preconditioned to believe they don’t have access to anything sensitive, even though they have unencumbered access to the corporate infrastructure and content.

Sadly, neither your company nor your employees are part of the decision tree to determine the level of interest by nation-states, competitors, criminal elements or untrustworthy insiders and their assessment of the value that lies within your corporate walls. Indeed, you may never know if your company has fallen within the bull’s-eye and is being engaged with for the illicit acquisition of its technology, data sets, intellectual property and the like.

Economic Espionage — What’s That?

The U.S. has laws in place to address economic espionage. According to Cornell University’s Legal Information Institute, this is defined as “the unlawful or clandestine targeting or acquisition of sensitive financial, trade or economic policy information, proprietary economic information or technological information.”

The U.S. government defines economic espionage within the context of the Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996. It noted that “the EEA contains two separate provisions that criminalize the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets. The first provision, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1831, is directed toward foreign economic espionage and requires that the theft of the trade secret be done to benefit a foreign government, instrumentality or agent. The second provision makes criminal the more common commercial theft of trade secrets, regardless of who benefits.”

The ‘We Have Nothing of Interest’ Myth

Using U.S.-centric data, “The Intellectual Property Commission Report” noted that the value of the intellectual property stolen from American companies is in the “hundreds of billions of dollars a year.” Additionally, the report claimed “intellectual property that is stolen over the Internet constitutes only a portion of total IP theft. Much of it occurs the old-fashioned way. Hard drives are either duplicated on site or physically stolen by bribed employees; … digitized products are pirated and sold illegally; phones are tapped for the purpose of obtaining trade secrets; and email accounts are compromised.”

Employees who think their day-to-day engagement does not include touching intellectual property are woefully mistaken. Items that are useful to the unscrupulous competitor or entity are innumerable. They wish to build their fortune on the back of yours and have many arrows in their quiver from which to choose their avenue of engagement.

Stealing Intellectual Property

The FBI identified a few common tactics with which intellectual property may be stolen. These include:

  • Technological acquisition of information, which may include visitor access to company intranets, spear phishing attacks or the theft of equipment (i.e., laptops, servers, drives);
  • On-site visits during which visitors engage in elicitation, snatch-and-grab theft, unauthorized photography or environmental sample collection;
  • Acquisition of the company’s trash and recyclables, well beyond the dumpster-diving of old;
  • Joint ventures and abandonment once intellectual property and trade secrets have been purloined;
  • Electronic surveillance of company events, off-sites and employees in travel mode.

While a review of the global media would have one believe economic espionage is conducted from within only a few key nations, a deeper look will find that international companies both large and small have experienced the theft of intellectual property, trade secrets and customer lists.

Remember, the entity that wants your information is seeking to advance its own efforts, usurp your brand via counterfeiting, steal your customers or negatively affect their relationship with your company. More simply put, these entities want to put your company out of business. A review of global and local infrastructure, awareness training, anomaly reporting and detection mechanisms are good first steps toward putting in place a counterintelligence or counterespionage program designed to protect the company and the employees.

More from Data Protection

Cost of a data breach 2023: Pharmaceutical industry impacts

3 min read - Data breaches are both commonplace and costly in the medical industry.  Two industry verticals that fall under the medical umbrella — healthcare and pharmaceuticals — sit at the top of the list of the highest average cost of a data breach, according to IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023. The health industry’s place at the top spot of most costly data breaches is probably not a surprise. With its sensitive and valuable data assets, it is one of…

Cost of a data breach 2023: Financial industry impacts

3 min read - According to the IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023, the global average cost of a data breach in 2023 was $4.45 million, 15% more than in 2020. In response, 51% of organizations plan to increase cybersecurity spending this year. For the financial industry, however, global statistics don’t tell the whole story. Finance firms lose approximately $5.9 million per data breach, 28% higher than the global average. In addition, evolving regulatory concerns play a role in how financial companies…

Advanced analytics can help detect insider threats rapidly

2 min read - While external cyber threats capture headlines, the rise of insider threats from within an organization is a growing concern. In 2023, the average cost of a data breach caused by an insider reached $4.90 million, 9.6% higher than the global average data breach cost of $4.45 million. To effectively combat this danger, integrating advanced analytics into data security software has become a critical and proactive defense strategy. Understanding insider threats Insider threats come from users who abuse authorized access to…

One simple way to cut ransomware recovery costs in half

4 min read - Whichever way you look at the data, it is considerably cheaper to use backups to recover from a ransomware attack than to pay the ransom. The median recovery cost for those that use backups is half the cost incurred by those that paid the ransom, according to a recent study. Similarly, the mean recovery cost is almost $1 million lower for those that used backups. Despite this fact, the use of backups is actually falling. This was one of the…