Defense in depth is a familiar security strategy to anyone who’s been the cybersecurity industry for more than a few months. Defense in depth uses a layered approach to protect networks and systems from breaches. It relies on multiple lines of defense — or layers of security controls — to provide redundancy in the event that one defense fails or a vulnerability is exploited.

In a traditional, linear network, for example, defenses were implemented in a line: external firewall connected to filtering router connected to internal firewall. Two-factor authentication could be another layer of control.

A linear defense-in-depth strategy has been effective for systems that were not mobile and where data was more contained — where, for example, employees only connected to the internet from their desktop computers at the office. But over time, the scope of where we interact with the internet and store our data has expanded considerably. We carry our tablets and smartphones everywhere and have full access to corporate data and services. Furthermore, much of our workloads now reside in the cloud, and we share these virtual workspaces with our partners.

Is Defense in Depth Dead?

Defense in depth is not dead. In fact, it’s more important than ever. We still need layers of protection, but how we think about architecting those layers is due for a refresh. A single, linear model is not suited to most modern use cases. In today’s world of mobility and cloud, we need multiple types of layers for shifting use cases. What works on-premises may not be available in the cloud. How you secure access and data on a mobile device is, by nature, different from the on-premises desktop and server.

What we need now is a flexible, orbital approach to defense in depth that provides protection no matter where the data resides, whether it be in the cloud, on a mobile device or in an Internet of Things (IoT) sensor. Total, 360-degree, orbital protection requires an understanding of what controls are available and effective based on a number of factors, including type of device, user characteristics, data sensitivity and physical location.

Orbital Defense and the Human Immune System

In orbital defense in depth, devices and sensors create an interconnected set of layers that can communicate and share intelligence about system health and potential threats. The human body also uses multiple layers of defense against microorganisms such as viruses and bacteria. The skin acts as the first line of defense against these potential invaders because it is not very penetrable. Our airways are another possible route for viruses and bacteria to enter the body. We can’t close them off, but we do have additional lines of defense in our respiratory system. Tiny hairs trap organisms before they can reach the very penetrable mucous membranes that line our respiratory system, and coughs and sneezes can expel potential invaders.

In the digital security immune system, this need for flexibility and an orbital approach can be applied to defense in depth because not all layers are needed or available for all use cases. For example, full packet capture and system logs may not be available for workloads in public clouds, and biometric identification is available on most modern mobile devices, but is not as common on laptops or desktops.

Read our interactive brochure on the security immune system

The Power of Intelligence and Communication

Additionally, linear defense-in-depth architecture does not address the benefits of communication between layers or among systems in the same layer. One of the reasons the human immune system is so powerful is because its organs and cells work together through a sophisticated communication network. When an invader is detected, white blood cells get the alert and head to the site to destroy the pathogens. T cells cluster to share information about pathogens, “which in turn helps the immune system mount a coordinated response,” according to the University of California San Francisco.

The security immune system is an advancement over traditional, linear defense in depth because the layers can be applied by use case and they can communicate with each other. For example, if the security operations center (SOC) analytics tool detects unwanted traffic from an external device, the firewall can be alerted to block access from that device.

Or if a database monitoring tool flags activity as suspicious, it can share it with a user behavior analytics (UBA) tool. Using this information from another source, the UBA may have enough context to determine that the database activity is malicious and communicate this back to the database tool so the user or activity is blocked. These are just two examples of how a security immune system takes an integrated, orbital approach to the familiar layers of defense in depth.

Learn More

To see a SOC in action, watch this video about the IBM X-Force Command Centers. For use cases that illustrate how a security immune system can work, download our interactive brochure.

More from Intelligence & Analytics

RansomExx Upgrades to Rust

IBM Security X-Force Threat Researchers have discovered a new variant of the RansomExx ransomware that has been rewritten in the Rust programming language, joining a growing trend of ransomware developers switching to the language. Malware written in Rust often benefits from lower AV detection rates (compared to those written in more common languages) and this may have been the primary reason to use the language. For example, the sample analyzed in this report was not detected as malicious in the…

Moving at the Speed of Business — Challenging Our Assumptions About Cybersecurity

The traditional narrative for cybersecurity has been about limited visibility and operational constraints — not business opportunities. These conversations are grounded in various assumptions, such as limited budgets, scarce resources, skills being at a premium, the attack surface growing, and increased complexity. For years, conventional thinking has been that cybersecurity costs a lot, takes a long time, and is more of a cost center than an enabler of growth. In our upcoming paper, Prosper in the Cyber Economy, published by…

Overcoming Distrust in Information Sharing: What More is There to Do?

As cyber threats increase in frequency and intensity worldwide, it has never been more crucial for governments and private organizations to work together to identify, analyze and combat attacks. Yet while the federal government has strongly supported this model of private-public information sharing, the reality is less than impressive. Many companies feel that intel sharing is too one-sided, as businesses share as much threat intel as governments want but receive very little in return. The question is, have government entities…

Tackling Today’s Attacks and Preparing for Tomorrow’s Threats: A Leader in 2022 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for SIEM

Get the latest on IBM Security QRadar SIEM, recognized as a Leader in the 2022 Gartner Magic Quadrant. As I talk to security leaders across the globe, four main themes teams constantly struggle to keep up with are: The ever-evolving and increasing threat landscape Access to and retaining skilled security analysts Learning and managing increasingly complex IT environments and subsequent security tooling The ability to act on the insights from their security tools including security information and event management software…