Most organizations today have multiple attack vectors that require monitoring and defending. Government cybersecurity teams, in comparison, have to manage countless additional entry points for threat actors. While most industries must understand and defend against attacks from vendors, satellite offices, wireless networks and bring-your-own-device (BYOD) threats, governments also have to worry about large numbers of disparate entities that tie into a central information technology hub.

As seen over the past 18 months with attacks in Colorado, Atlanta, Baltimore and Dallas, among others, cities and states must protect their infrastructure, transportation, social services, healthcare, emergency services and many other divisions. The sheer number of connections into government networks substantially increases the risk and complexity facing these administrations.

Extortion via ransomware seems to be the popular choice for many cybercriminals today, but what does tomorrow bring? With so many government services dependent on technology, there are many opportunities for a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. Government cybersecurity experts need to stay ahead of these criminals and, in doing so, understand the environments they’re defending. Defenders must see the entire threat landscape and understand where attacks can come from. Protecting environments with one point of entry is easy; unfortunately, that situation rarely exists in the real world, particularly with government infrastructure.

The Complexity of Governments Increases Risk

Inside every national, state, city and local government are many different departments, each with its own information technology requirements and solutions. Too often, the teams that run these systems don’t interoperate with other groups. For example, in county government, there is a clerk and recorder responsible for elections, police responsible for civil protection and social services responsible for improving social welfare in the community. Each of these groups might have its own IT shop that manages the computers and networks for the department.

There is typically little to no communication between the people who set up, manage and maintain these environments. To make matters worse, the policies and procedures used to build and harden security infrastructures are rarely consistent between departments. Lack of commonality leads to extreme risk, and the larger the government organization, the more points of entry it has and the more threats it faces.

Threat actors understand these deficiencies and can identify vulnerabilities relatively easily through several methods. Today, the most common approach involves phishing attacks in which an attacker attempts to trick an end user into providing credentials for one part of a network. Since most government networks communicate and connect with each other, a breach in one division puts the rest at risk as well.

Imagine that a social worker loses control of his or her credentials, and a threat actor proceeds to access that environment and move laterally through the network to infiltrate the police department and the county clerk and recorder. This individual could acquire valuable data such as voting rolls for a county. The lack of procedures to manage credentials and patch systems between government entities increases the risk of both losing control of login information and permitting lateral movement between government bodies. This scenario epitomizes a substantial risk to governments that other industries do not face.

Government Cybersecurity Improvements Won’t Come Easy

Since governments have so many potential attack vectors, both physically and virtually, government cybersecurity professionals need clear processes, procedures and authority to harden vulnerable environments.

Whether they’re implementing asset management, patch management, change management or any number of critical security mechanisms, governments and their partners need to consolidate and coordinate between internal entities to make sure every attack vector has proper defensive positioning. The number of endpoints, network connections and infrastructure devices that interoperate internally within a government body at any level creates substantial risks, and the entire environment must be understood and modifiable to ensure proper protection.

The challenges governments face in hardening their environments are large and widespread, with drastic change being the only foreseeable solution. Engaging disparate teams to integrate and interoperate, both operationally and procedurally, will take strong leadership and bold decisions. Unless and until we see a major change in both the behavior and understanding of the threat landscape, there will be more and more attacks and, sadly, they will become more dangerous and impactful to governments on a regular basis. Without major modifications inside government cybersecurity organizations, we are in for a bumpy ride.

More from Government

What’s Going Into NIST’s New Digital Identity Guidelines?

One of this year’s biggest positive cybersecurity events comes from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). For the first time since 2017, NIST is updating its digital identity guidelines. These new guidelines will help set the course for best practices in handling digital identity for organizations across all sectors. What is Digital Identity? To grasp the update’s importance, it helps to understand the role of digital identity in an organization’s security posture. In its 2017 guidelines, NIST defines…

Who Will Be the Next National Cyber Director?

After Congress approved his nomination in 2021, Chris Inglis served as the first-ever National Cyber Director for the White House. Now, he plans to retire. So who’s next? As of this writing in January of 2023, there remains uncertainty around who will fill the role. However, the frontrunner is Kemba Walden, Acting Director of the National Cyber Director’s office. Walden is a former Microsoft executive who joined the National Cyber Director’s office in May. Before her appointment, Walden was the…

How Much is the U.S. Investing in Cyber (And is it Enough)?

It’s no secret that cyberattacks in the U.S. are increasing in frequency and sophistication. Since cyber crime impacts millions of businesses and individuals, many look to the government to see what it’s doing to anticipate, prevent and deal with these crimes. To gain perspective on what’s happening in this area, the U.S. government’s budget and spending plans for cyber is a great place to start. This article will explore how much the government is spending, where that money is going…

What the New Federal Cybersecurity Act Means for Businesses

On December 21, 2022, President Biden signed the Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act. The risk of quantum-powered password decryption is increasing exponentially. The new legislation is designed to help federal agencies proactively shift to a post-quantum security posture. Agencies have until May 4, 2023, to submit an inventory of potentially vulnerable systems, and the Act directs the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to prioritize the adoption of post-quantum cryptography standards. For businesses, government efforts to address emerging quantum risks…