March 24, 2015 By Christopher Burgess 3 min read

The age-old canard, “Trust me, I’m from the government,” has been around for hundreds of years and has been greeted universally with a smirk or a chortle. However, it probably was never used in the context of a data breach discussion. There have been massive data breaches involving individuals’ data coming from governmental entities. These breaches include two noteworthy events from the recent past: the 2012 breach that compromised the personally identifiable information (PII) of 3.6 million South Carolina taxpayers and the 2011 compromise of the PII of more than 8.3 million U.K. citizens when a National Health Service laptop was stolen.

PII is just one data set with identified value. Nations also have nation-state secrets that must be protected. The protection afforded these nation-state secrets has led to their public dissection by a wayward insider or two who opted to break trust and lay before the court of public opinion whether the decisions, actions or intentions of different governments, organizations or leaders were appropriate.

Fast-forward to the business side of the equation, and one would think the lessons introduced by the governmental breaches would provide a sufficient impetus to all businesses, be they large enterprises or small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs), to take every possible precaution to protect their sensitive data. Yet the past 12 months have shown that size doesn’t matter when it comes to data breaches. Though an enterprise breach carries a larger footprint than one against an SMB, the data lost has an identical effect on the victims. For those entities that have the misfortune of experiencing a data breach involving PII, their remediation puts their hands deep in their pockets.

According to the Ponemon Institute, remediation on average had businesses ponying up $3.5 million (or $145 per record) when all was said and done. For those entities that lost their intellectual property or trade secrets, quantifying the cost of the loss may not be as cleanly calculated, though it carries the potential of being substantially higher than the cost of losing PII. The loss of one’s intellectual property or trade secrets has the very real potential of putting the affected company out of a market, if not out of business.

The Online Trust Alliance (OTA) recently revealed in its 2015 Data Protection Best Practices and Risk Assessment Guides that more than 90 percent of the 2014 data breaches could have been prevented using available technologies or adherence to basic processes and procedures.

External Intrusions

Networks and devices are constantly being targeted, with the OTA’s study showing 40 percent of data breaches were caused by external intrusions. In the recent slew of retail transaction system data breaches, the cybercriminals used a bit of social engineering and acquired the credentials of a third-party vendor to access the internal network of the targeted entity. Attention must be paid to investing in access controls, especially those afforded access via the side door of the vendor relationship, where visibility into the third party’s ecosystem is not as robust as the organization’s visibility into its own.

Equally important is the need to wrap one’s arms around the personal devices that connect to a company’s networks. One must also address the security of applications used by the company and ensure security considerations are taken into account when designing applications used by clients and customers.

Lost Devices and Social Engineering

As previously mentioned, social engineering of the insider is the fast track to system access. The OTA found that 29 percent of the data breaches were caused by employee error, either by lost devices and documents (18 percent) or social engineering and fraud (11 percent). These are both areas in which an investment in employee education would pay immediate dividends. Ongoing education on phishing techniques and social engineering methodologies are wise investments since the individual with natural access to sensitive data may be the weakest link in the data protection schema. Similarly, ensuring devices and data stores that contain PII or sensitive company documents are encrypted could have largely mitigated the two data breaches discussed above.

Data Breach From Insiders

Far too often, companies expect their employees to protect their data but fail to direct and provide the educational resources on how, exactly, the employee should make that happen. When malicious employees cross the chasm of ethical decision-making, detection largely depends on their exceeding their natural access of behavioral queues evidenced within the workplace. Well-meaning employees who inadvertently put the company at risk are omnipresent. They may share access credentials, leave devices unattended or create their own workaround methodologies that run outside the company’s infrastructure — all in an effort to perform their job more efficiently, with nary a consideration of how their actions put the company at risk.

We’re All in This Together

Regardless of where your entity sits, data must be protected. Investing in security may not remove the possibility of a data breach, but the OTA’s sound advice to have controls designed to prevent, detect, contain and remediate data breaches will move the odds of a data breach occurring closer to zero. After all, who wants to be the one delivering the message, “Oops, I just lost your data!” to customers, clients or the C-suite?

More from Data Protection

Data security tools make data loss prevention more efficient

3 min read - As businesses navigate the complexities of modern-day cybersecurity initiatives, data loss prevention (DLP) software is the frontline defense against potential data breaches and exfiltration. DLP solutions allow organizations to detect, react to and prevent data leakage or misuse of sensitive information that can lead to catastrophic consequences. However, while DLP solutions play a critical role in cybersecurity, their effectiveness significantly improves when integrated with the right tools and infrastructure. Key limitations of DLP solutions (and how to overcome them) DLP…

Defense in depth: Layering your security coverage

2 min read - The more valuable a possession, the more steps you take to protect it. A home, for example, is protected by the lock systems on doors and windows, but the valuable or sensitive items that a criminal might steal are stored with even more security — in a locked filing cabinet or a safe. This provides layers of protection for the things you really don’t want a thief to get their hands on. You tailor each item’s protection accordingly, depending on…

What is data security posture management?

3 min read - Do you know where all your organization’s data resides across your hybrid cloud environment? Is it appropriately protected? How sure are you? 30%? 50%? It may not be enough. The Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023 revealed that 82% of breaches involved data in the cloud, and 39% of breached data was stored across multiple types of environments. If you have any doubt, your enterprise should consider acquiring a data security posture management (DSPM) solution. With the global average…

Cost of a data breach: The evolving role of law enforcement

4 min read - If someone broke into your company’s office to steal your valuable assets, your first step would be to contact law enforcement. But would your reaction be the same if someone broke into your company’s network and accessed your most valuable assets through a data breach? A decade ago, when smartphones were still relatively new and most people were still coming to understand the value of data both corporate-wide and personally, there was little incentive to report cyber crime. It was…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today