June 11, 2018 By Sue Poremba 3 min read

The largest ever distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack occurred in the spring of 2018. The attack lasted more than eight minutes and measured 1.3 Tbps, according to Threatpost.

But it’s a record no one in the security industry expects to last long, as DDoS attacks continue to increase in length, strength and damage.

This type of cyberattack could cost your company an average of $50,000 per attack in lost business revenue, according to an April 2018 Coreo study. This amount is considerably less than a February 2018 report, which found that a DDoS attack could cost a small business $120,000 — and an enterprise more than $2 million.

While any dollar amount of lost revenue caused by this style of attack is significant, the Coreo study found that financial loss is only the fourth-worst damaging consequence for businesses.

Loss of Trust and Other Damaging DDoS Consequences

The loss of consumer trust following DDoS attacks ranked as the number one consequence for businesses, according to the Corero study, which surveyed more than 300 security professionals. This was followed by theft of intellectual property as the second-worst consequence and the threat of a malware infection as the third.

The study also found that DDoS attacks are a constant battle for security professionals. Their organizations — no matter the industry — are seeing an average of one DDoS attempt per day.

“DDoS attacks can have an immediate and damaging impact on a company’s bottom line, both in terms of lost revenue and the costs incurred in terms of manpower required to mitigate attacks,” said Ashley Stephenson, CEO at Corero Network Security. “Not all DDoS attacks will cost an organization $50,000, but having your website taken offline can damage customer trust and confidence.”

Evolving Attack Vectors

DDoS attacks were once considered more of a nuisance and reputational style of cyberattack. It’s a favored choice of cyber weapon of hacktivist groups wanting to make a statement and garner attention. There was a time when you could almost count on groups like Anonymous to take down the website of an organization they didn’t agree with.

This has changed: Attacks have become more sophisticated and sustained. Attackers are taking advantage of the increasing number of vulnerable devices connecting to the network. They’re turning to the Internet of Things (IoT) and mobile devices and using them — through the spread of malware — as botnets designed to take down large-scale networks.

Mirai showcased how easy it is to turn an average IoT device into a botnet, and now we’re beginning to see new variations like Reaper (and other botnets) evolving to take over people’s devices.

These rented botnets are a growing trend in attacks — and one of many new avenues attackers are using, CSO reported. “Another trend is the use of multiple attack vectors within an attack, also known as Advanced Persistent Denial-of-Service [APDoS],” CSO reported. “For instance, an APDoS attack may involve the application layer, such as attacks against databases and applications as well as directly on the server.”

Read the complete X-Force research report: Weaponizing the Internet of Things

Smoke Screen: A Distraction Technique

Many of these attacks are designed to be a smoke screen, noted Corero. While the large attacks that target huge enterprises often block access to major retail, media, financial and social websites, most attacks are low-key and under the wire.

Attention has to be paid to these attacks to prevent the major consequences caused by a DDoS attack. While security personnel are focused on mitigating the attack, the attackers get busy testing the organization’s network for vulnerabilities or looking for ways to stealthy access data.

“Considering the huge liability that organizations can face in the event of a data breach, IT teams must be proactive in defending against the DDoS threat and monitor closely for such malicious activity on their networks,” Corero reported.

Prepare for DDoS Attacks

DDoS has historically been one of the most difficult types of cyberattacks to defend. Perimeter defenses don’t work. Instead, experts recommend focusing on mitigation tools and providers. Also, develop a mitigation and incident response (IR) plan that, if you’re taken offline, backup services can kick in, and damage is kept to a minimum.

Customers come to your websites to do business. If they can’t access you, the immediate loss of business revenue will hurt — but their frustration could turn them to another company who is available. Can you afford the loss of customer trust?

More from Network

Databases beware: Abusing Microsoft SQL Server with SQLRecon

20 min read - Over the course of my career, I’ve had the privileged opportunity to peek behind the veil of some of the largest organizations in the world. In my experience, most industry verticals rely on enterprise Windows networks. In fact, I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen a decentralized zero-trust network, enterprise Linux, macOS network, or Active Directory alternative (FreeIPA). As I navigate my way through these large and often complex enterprise networks, it is common…

Easy configuration fixes can protect your server from attack

4 min read - In March 2023, data on more than 56,000 people — including Social Security numbers and other personal information — was stolen in the D.C. Health Benefit Exchange Authority breach. The online health insurance marketplace hack exposed the personal details of Congress members, their families, staff and tens of thousands of other Washington-area residents. It appears the D.C. breach was due to “human error”, according to a recent report. Apparently, a computer server was misconfigured to allow access to data without proper…

X-Force identifies vulnerability in IoT platform

4 min read - The last decade has seen an explosion of IoT devices across a multitude of industries. With that rise has come the need for centralized systems to perform data collection and device management, commonly called IoT Platforms. One such platform, ThingsBoard, was the recent subject of research by IBM Security X-Force. While there has been a lot of discussion around the security of IoT devices themselves, there is far less conversation around the security of the platforms these devices connect with.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today