March 25, 2016 By Angelika Steinacker 3 min read

With Gartner having recently held its annual Identity and Access Management Summit in London, the identity and access management (IAM) space is very much in the spotlight for both the security and business communities.

IAM’s has accelerated rapidly as a result of a simple development: There is more of everything these days. More devices, platforms, applications and many more channels — and all require connecting to today’s enterprises.

As corporations have moved toward cloud, mobile, social and IoT-enabled environments, the IT landscape required to deliver business efficiency and growth has become increasingly complex. This leads to inevitable security vulnerabilities.

Securing Identity and Access Today

IAM and threat protection are related security disciplines. There are a number of process, organizational, functional and technological overlaps that need to be considered if a company is to operate a robust, multifaceted approach to IAM and risk management.

While two-factor authentication has been traditionally accepted as the preferred security approach to access, it’s no longer the only option. Thanks to the advancements in cognitive and predictive analytics, the security play around access and its management is moving beyond simply providing strong user authentication.

The last few years have seen the IAM equation become less of a siloed, stand-alone question; it now brings together several elements that have always played a part in access management into a cohesive, synchronized system working toward a goal. The landscape is far more evolved, incorporating things like:

  • Modern identity architecture;
  • Identity governance and administration;
  • Identity analytics;
  • Identity proofing and authorization;
  • Identity issues in the cloud;
  • Identity for third parties; and
  • Using identity to protect APIs (and vice versa).

The key to minimizing security vulnerabilities is the adoption of a layered cognitive approach to the wider IAM question.

Adding Cognitive Elements to the Mix

We’ve now reached a point where we can look at what devices, applications and networks are being used to access corporate systems at a granular level and then combine that data to generate a macro view. Through this intelligent use of constantly regenerated data, businesses can make policy and control decisions to keep themselves safe. By taking a more rounded, holistic approach to what access management actually represents, proof of identity at the device, platform, application and human level can be vastly improved.

This is where IAM meets cognitive security. With a cognitive, predictive approach to IAM, it would be possible to shut down logins that look suspicious or don’t fit with usual user patterns. For example, a 3 a.m. login attempt from an unauthorized device in China for a French-based company would trigger a flag to the security response team as irregular activity.

An IAM solution would be customized according to a set of rules regarding who gets access to the network and in what context. This could mean shutting off access from any unsecured wireless networks or devices that have not been updated to comply with corporate security policy, or to send out a request for an additional authentication step.

Achieving Strong Security

The cybersecurity element of IAM requires a layered approach, much like wider business strategy does. However, due to the fast pace and complex nature of the security space, this can be hard to achieve.

Recognition of data priorities and the challenges around identity management and access protocols are central to the success of any company, especially as the technology landscape they operate within becomes increasingly disparate.

Perhaps the most important element for success in terms of usability and overall IAM security will be ensuring that everyone within the organization understands the encompassing cybersecurity strategy itself. Education, engagement and transparency across all business units and functions will be key to maintaining a safe and successful operating environment.

Read the white paper to learn more: Take back control of your access management

More from Identity & Access

Another category? Why we need ITDR

5 min read - Technologists are understandably suffering from category fatigue. This fatigue can be more pronounced within security than in any other sub-sector of IT. Do the use cases and risks of today warrant identity threat detection and response (ITDR)? To address this question, we work backwards from the vulnerabilities, threats, misconfigurations and attacks that IDTR specializes in providing visibility into. As identity threat detection and response (ITDR) technology evolves, one of the most common queries we get is: “Why do we need…

Access control is going mobile — Is this the way forward?

2 min read - Last year, the highest volume of cyberattacks (30%) started in the same way: a cyber criminal using valid credentials to gain access. Even more concerning, the X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2024 found that this method of attack increased by 71% from 2022. Researchers also discovered a 266% increase in infostealers to obtain credentials to use in an attack. Family members of privileged users are also sometimes victims.“These shifts suggest that threat actors have revalued credentials as a reliable and preferred…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today