Reports surfaced in April 2016 indicating that the personal information of children vaccinated at hospitals in China was posted for sale. The data, including home address and parent contact information, was obtained in part through unauthorized access and in part by malicious insiders who collaborated with attackers.

This is just one of the many examples involving insider attacks globally. According to the recently published “IBM X-Force 2016 Cyber Security Intelligence Index,” 60 percent of all attacks in 2015 were carried out by insiders. They either had malicious intent or served as inadvertent actors — insiders who either mistakenly allow an attacker access to data or fail to pay attention to cybersecurity policies.

What Do Malicious Insiders Want?

Why is your seemingly trustworthy employee, contractor, client or business partner targeting your organization? There are a number of motives behind cyberattacks as detailed in the IBM report “Know Your Cyber Enemy.”

We know that profit is the driver behind the most active areas of cybercrime. Malicious insiders, however, could also be encouraged by a nation-state to perform espionage.

Revenge is another possibility. For example, a disgruntled ex-employee with active credentials cloud access a target’s resources, or maybe he or she has retained corporate documents that could be sold or made public.

Read the complete IBM X-Force 2016 Cyber Security Intelligence Index

Is There Good News?

There is good news! Interestingly, this year’s data revealed that while insider attacks accounted for 60 percent of all security incidents in 2015, up from 55 percent in 2014, roughly one-third of those attacks were carried out by inadvertent actors. In comparison, these unwilling cohorts contributed to nearly half of all attacks in 2014.

What does this mean? Well, it could mean there were fewer “Oops, I didn’t mean to misconfigure a public-facing server to allow search engines to crawl and index corporate data!” Or fewer “Oops, I didn’t mean to click on that malicious attachment that downloaded malware and provided attackers access to hundreds of customer records!” You get the picture.

How to Prevent Insider Attacks

A reduction in the number of attacks attributed to inadvertent actors could mean that more organizations are implementing security policies and employee education. They’re doing a better job of communicating what’s expected and why it’s important.

In addition to security policies and employee education, there are a number of solutions that can mitigate the insider threat. Products that monitor behavior and provide anomaly detection are key. Focusing on access management, specifically privileged identity management (PIM), is an important step toward preventing data breaches.

Organizations can go a long way toward an effective defense against malicious insiders by implementing complete data life cycle management. This should help them do a better job of informing employees what to expect and why certain data stores need to be protected.

Download the IBM research report: Battling security threats from within your organization

More from Identity & Access

Another category? Why we need ITDR

5 min read - Technologists are understandably suffering from category fatigue. This fatigue can be more pronounced within security than in any other sub-sector of IT. Do the use cases and risks of today warrant identity threat detection and response (ITDR)? To address this question, we work backwards from the vulnerabilities, threats, misconfigurations and attacks that IDTR specializes in providing visibility into. As identity threat detection and response (ITDR) technology evolves, one of the most common queries we get is: “Why do we need…

Access control is going mobile — Is this the way forward?

2 min read - Last year, the highest volume of cyberattacks (30%) started in the same way: a cyber criminal using valid credentials to gain access. Even more concerning, the X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2024 found that this method of attack increased by 71% from 2022. Researchers also discovered a 266% increase in infostealers to obtain credentials to use in an attack. Family members of privileged users are also sometimes victims.“These shifts suggest that threat actors have revalued credentials as a reliable and preferred…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today