January 12, 2017 By Christopher Burgess 3 min read

It happens — employees leave. Sometimes they find growth opportunities and are encouraged, even cheered, by their employers to go for it. Other times, they are let go due to downsizing or performance issues, recruited by rivals or otherwise lured to greener pastures. In all scenarios, the employer’s intellectual property (IP) is at risk.

Revenge, greed and resentment are the main factors that motivate outgoing employees to commit IP theft. That’s why it’s important to have an exit process when a worker departs from your company — one that can be accelerated if that employee is departing for cause.

The Exit Process

Every organization should have an exit interview and departure protocol in place. A manager or a human resources representative should interview the departing employee to asses motivation for departure and solicit suggestions for improvement. The paperwork should include a signed attestation that all intellectual property has been returned to the company.

The interviewer should have a list of all devices issued to the employee and recover these devices. Furthermore, if endpoint telemetry allowed, the departing employee should be given an opportunity to identify the disposition of all storage devices, especially those used in the previous 90 days.

Once all devices are accounted for, the interviewer or company representative should escort the employee out the door and collect his or her identification credentials. Upon the employee’s departure, the IT department should adjust the technology infrastructure to abolish all access permissions to data, infrastructure and the facility.

The exit process is essential to protect the company from IP theft, preserve the revenue stream and prevent the inadvertent or inappropriate exposure of customer data. While no organization is immune to the vulnerabilities that lead to security breaches, those without a comprehensive exit process are ripe for harvesting.

Noteworthy Examples of IP Theft

A rather famous incident involved the departure of two hotel employees who took the entire playbook for a brand concept from one hotelier to the other. According to The New York Times, the employees were recruited on the condition that they brought their former employer’s intellectual property with them. In the end, the original employer received a substantial monetary award and its concept was protected, thanks to an HR dispute that revealed evidence of IP theft. This discovery had nothing to do with IT security or internal controls, however — just pure luck.

In a more recent case, a software gaming company accused outgoing employees of wholesale IP theft. According to the court filing, the company had a departure protocol in place that required appropriate attestation of the protection of all IP. The company also had the ability to conduct robust forensic examinations of the departing employee’s devices and online activity. In total, the employee in question purloined more than 14,000 documents and 26 GB of information and copied it to identified storage devices, Ars Technica reported.

In another case, an IT administrator who amicably departed from his employer went on to exploit access to the company’s infrastructure and steal insider information to facilitate securities fraud. All registered devices were returned according to proper exit protocols, but the former employee had used his administrative access to provision an undocumented laptop that had been issued to him early in his career. The exit process failed to catch the unregistered device and the greedy ex-employee made $350,000 by exploiting internal data prior to earnings announcements, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) complaint.

Revenge frequently comes into play in cases of IP theft. Last year, a network administrator for an internet service provider (ISP) wrought havoc on his former employer’s IT infrastructure after being terminated. The technically savvy ex-employee installed backdoors that gave him continued access and destroyed thousands of files and directories. The network crashed as a result, and the ISP was unable to sustain service to more than 5,000 residential customers and 500 business customers for over a week, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. The company was ultimately forced to rebuild its network from scratch.

Pride can also motivate outgoing employees to compromise a company’s IP. In 2014, for example, a departing software engineer in Australia copied 120,000 files of his work as a “trophy,” according to law firm Meerkin & Apel. The court found him guilty of theft and fined him approximately $37,000, concluding that the former employee was “fully aware” that the information was central to his employer’s business and that it would be useful in future employment.

Ask the Tough Questions

It behooves both employees and employers to ask indelicate questions during onboarding and exit interviews. When your employees arrive, have them attest that they are not bringing with them any intellectual property from another entity. When they depart, ensure they leave all intellectual property behind. An effective exit process is key to resolving disputes and validating or refuting suspicion in this area.

More from Identity & Access

Another category? Why we need ITDR

5 min read - Technologists are understandably suffering from category fatigue. This fatigue can be more pronounced within security than in any other sub-sector of IT. Do the use cases and risks of today warrant identity threat detection and response (ITDR)? To address this question, we work backwards from the vulnerabilities, threats, misconfigurations and attacks that IDTR specializes in providing visibility into. As identity threat detection and response (ITDR) technology evolves, one of the most common queries we get is: “Why do we need…

Access control is going mobile — Is this the way forward?

2 min read - Last year, the highest volume of cyberattacks (30%) started in the same way: a cyber criminal using valid credentials to gain access. Even more concerning, the X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2024 found that this method of attack increased by 71% from 2022. Researchers also discovered a 266% increase in infostealers to obtain credentials to use in an attack. Family members of privileged users are also sometimes victims.“These shifts suggest that threat actors have revalued credentials as a reliable and preferred…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today