January 7, 2015 By Rick M Robinson 2 min read

Domains and domain names are fundamental to the operation of the Internet. They provide a hierarchy of unique identifiers that guide traffic across the Web and identify websites, servers and other resources. However, in the form of malicious domains, they are a basic tool in the hands of cybercriminals.

As with other aspects of computer security, there are no silver bullets for protecting against malicious domains. However, understanding domain names can help firms and individual employees guard themselves against attacks.

Domain names form a hierarchy of domains and subdomains. For example, marketing.companyname.com is a subdomain of companyname.com. In turn, this is one of the many subdomains of the familiar top-level domain (TLD) com. It is typical to type a period in front of TLD names, as in .com, though the period is technically a separator, not part of the TLD itself.

Looking at the TLD Landscape

A recent IBM security intelligence and research report, “The .Bizness Behind Malicious Domain Names,” looks at malicious domains and their distribution across the overall domain name structure, particularly the various TLDs, such as .com, .net and .org. The report builds on research from IBM security partner CrowdStrike, which keeps track of ongoing malicious activity online.

CrowdStrike’s survey found that the largest single group of malicious domains, about one-third of the total, fall under the TLD .biz. This TLD was created specifically for business use in 2000 to alleviate overcrowding within the original .com TLD (which dates back to the 1980s).

It should be emphasized that most .biz websites are perfectly legitimate businesses. However, the difficulty of policing an entire global TLD has let cybercriminals register domain names that often mimic well-known, legitimate domains, such as the websites of major firms. Most other malicious domains fall under the long-established .org, .com and .net TLDs. Some have country-specific TLDs, often to either target victims in those countries or disguise their own origins.

Protecting Against Malicious Domains

The best protection against malicious domains is user awareness. For example, a domain name such as companyname.com.biz should trigger immediate suspicion. It is deceptively trying to masquerade as a subdomain of the .com TLD when, in fact, it is a subdomain of .biz.

Overly clever spellings, such as wind0wsupdates.com, should also raise a red flag. Unfortunately, all too many users have “domain blindness” and pay little or no attention to where they are actually going online. Moreover, mobile devices such as smartphones may hide address bars in order to conserve limited screen space.

Firms and other organizations can use a brute-force method to protect against some malicious domains by blocking entire TLDs. If, for example, a company has no business partners with a .biz subdomain, it can bar all connections to .biz. Individual exceptions can then be white-listed.

However, this is not practical for TLDs such as .com or .org. Along with encouraging user awareness, the best protection is provided by a security partner that can provide up-to-date listings of malicious domains to avoid.

More from Intelligence & Analytics

Hive0051’s large scale malicious operations enabled by synchronized multi-channel DNS fluxing

12 min read - For the last year and a half, IBM X-Force has actively monitored the evolution of Hive0051’s malware capabilities. This Russian threat actor has accelerated its development efforts to support expanding operations since the onset of the Ukraine conflict. Recent analysis identified three key changes to capabilities: an improved multi-channel approach to DNS fluxing, obfuscated multi-stage scripts, and the use of fileless PowerShell variants of the Gamma malware. As of October 2023, IBM X-Force has also observed a significant increase in…

Email campaigns leverage updated DBatLoader to deliver RATs, stealers

11 min read - IBM X-Force has identified new capabilities in DBatLoader malware samples delivered in recent email campaigns, signaling a heightened risk of infection from commodity malware families associated with DBatLoader activity. X-Force has observed nearly two dozen email campaigns since late June leveraging the updated DBatLoader loader to deliver payloads such as Remcos, Warzone, Formbook, and AgentTesla. DBatLoader malware has been used since 2020 by cybercriminals to install commodity malware remote access Trojans (RATs) and infostealers, primarily via malicious spam (malspam). DBatLoader…

New Hive0117 phishing campaign imitates conscription summons to deliver DarkWatchman malware

8 min read - IBM X-Force uncovered a new phishing campaign likely conducted by Hive0117 delivering the fileless malware DarkWatchman, directed at individuals associated with major energy, finance, transport, and software security industries based in Russia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, and Estonia. DarkWatchman malware is capable of keylogging, collecting system information, and deploying secondary payloads. Imitating official correspondence from the Russian government in phishing emails aligns with previous Hive0117 campaigns delivering DarkWatchman malware, and shows a possible significant effort to induce a sense of urgency as…

X-Force releases detection & response framework for managed file transfer software

5 min read - How AI can help defenders scale detection guidance for enterprise software tools If we look back at mass exploitation events that shook the security industry like Log4j, Atlassian, and Microsoft Exchange when these solutions were actively being exploited by attackers, the exploits may have been associated with a different CVE, but the detection and response guidance being released by the various security vendors had many similarities (e.g., Log4shell vs. Log4j2 vs. MOVEit vs. Spring4Shell vs. Microsoft Exchange vs. ProxyShell vs.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today