May 15, 2019 By David Bisson 2 min read

Threat actors have launched a new malware campaign that uses a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack to infect unsuspecting users with the Plead backdoor.

At the end of April 2019, ESET observed several attempts to distribute the Plead backdoor using what was most likely a MitM attack. Each of these attempts created and executed the malware through “AsusWSPanel.exe,” a legitimate process belonging to the Windows client of ASUS WebStorage. Researchers also confirmed that each of the discovered Plead samples used “Asus Webstorage Upate.exe” as their file name.

In its analysis of these infection attempts, ESET proposed that ASUS Cloud Corporation, the developer of ASUS WebStorage, could have suffered a supply chain attack. But the researchers admitted that some findings, including the fact that the same update mechanism delivered legitimate ASUS WebStorage binaries, likely ruled this scenario out.

They said it was far more likely that digital attackers used a MitM attack at the router level to modify the update check of the ASUS WebStorage software. ESET’s researchers observed this activity in the wild when threat actors inserted a new URL that pointed to a malicious file hosted at a compromised gov.tw domain.

Peering Into Plead’s History

The actors behind Plead are known to use a router scanner to search for vulnerable routers. Once they’ve compromised a router, they use its virtual private network (VPN) feature to register the device as a virtual server. They can then leverage this asset as a command-and-control (C&C) server for delivering malware.

Researchers have learned much about Plead since the threat first became active in 2012. In June 2017, for instance, Trend Micro uncovered common denominators between Plead and two other attack tools named Shrouded Crossbow and Waterbear. These commonalities led the security firm to conclude that all three utilities fit into the arsenal of the threat group BlackTech.

The malware has been involved in other attack campaigns since then, too. In July 2018, for example, ESET identified a campaign that abused code-signing certificates to spread the threat.

How to Defend Against a Malware-Laden MitM Attack

Security professionals can help defend their organizations against MitM attacks by using network monitoring tools to analyze network traffic in real time for risks and vulnerabilities. This solution should also help security teams prioritize risks and vulnerabilities based on where data is stored.

Organizations should also leverage unified endpoint management (UEM) to monitor their devices for suspicious activity, including what could be malicious behavior.

More from

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

DOD establishes Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy

2 min read - The federal government recently took a new step toward prioritizing cybersecurity and demonstrating its commitment to reducing risk. On March 20, 2024, the Pentagon formally established the new Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy to supervise cyber policy for the Department of Defense. The next day, President Joe Biden announced Michael Sulmeyer as his nominee for the role.“In standing up this office, the Department is giving cyber the focus and attention that Congress intended,” said Acting…

Unpacking the NIST cybersecurity framework 2.0

4 min read - The NIST cybersecurity framework (CSF) helps organizations improve risk management using common language that focuses on business drivers to enhance cybersecurity.NIST CSF 1.0 was released in February 2014, and version 1.1 in April 2018. In February 2024, NIST released its newest CSF iteration: 2.0. The journey to CSF 2.0 began with a request for information (RFI) in February 2022. Over the next two years, NIST engaged the cybersecurity community through analysis, workshops, comments and draft revision to refine existing standards…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today