In September 2011, we reported the first SpyEye-in-the-mobile (SPitMo) attack targeting banking customers on the Android platform. Recently, we discovered the first Tatanga-based man-in-the-mobile (MitMo) attack, as well as new SPitMo configurations that are targeting Android mobile banking users in Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. With nearly 60 percent of the market and a reputation for weak app security, it’s no surprise that Android has become the preferred target for financial malware.

How Man-in-the-Mobile Works

Like previous attacks, both the SPitMo and Tatanga MitMo variants target Windows users on the Web and use a webinjection in the desktop browser to lure them into installing a fake security application on their phones. The fraudsters claim this application is required by the bank as a new layer of protection and that 15 million bank customers around the world are already using it. The victims are asked to choose the device’s operating system from the following list:

  • iOS (iPhone)
  • BlackBerry
  • Android (Samsung, HTC, etc.)
  • Symbian (Nokia)
  • Other

In most attacks, if the victim is using an operating system other than Android, the malware informs the user that no further action is required. For Android users, however, the desktop component of the MitMo attack requests victims’ phone numbers and notifies them that a link for downloading the security application has been sent via SMS to their mobile device. Users are directed to install the fake application from this link and enter the activation code provided by the malware. Certain attacks also request that BlackBerry users download the application, but it does not actually install on those devices.

Once installed, the mobile malware captures all SMS traffic, including transaction authorization codes sent by the bank to the victim, and forwards them to the fraudsters. This enables the criminals to initiate fraudulent transfers and capture the security codes needed to bypass the SMS-based out-of-band authorization systems used by many European banks.

The attackers use different social engineering tricks in each country to lure victims into downloading the fake application, including URLs with the words “secure” and “Android files” with a .com domain name. IBM investigated the registration information for these URLs, which were located in China and the United States. They were registered in June just prior to the initial attacks. All URLs are inactive at the moment. Both Tatanga and SpyEye use the same Android application in this attack.

Old Techniques, New Channel: Mobile Malware Adapting PC Threat Techniques

Spanish Bank Customer Attacks

In the attack on Spanish banks, the victims are asked to download the security application from a link in an SMS sent to their mobile phones. Here is a screen capture of the message displayed to the victims during their online banking session:

The message mentions that the bank has taken steps to protect its customers against attacks on mobile devices and requires the user to install the application. The malware then asks Android users to submit a code they receive with the text message to activate the application.

BlackBerry users are notified that the security application has been installed successfully, although it only installs on Android devices.

Victims who use other mobile operating systems are notified that their device does not require this special security measure.

German Bank Customer Attacks

In the German attacks, criminals lure victims into downloading the fake application by claiming the bank has developed special security measures in cooperation with Oracle. As mentioned above, the fraudsters claim that more than 15 million bank customers around the world already use the system.

Android users are asked to download the security application from a link sent by the malware via SMS and to submit the activation code on the bank’s spoofed Web page.

As in the Spanish attack, BlackBerry users are notified that the application was successfully installed and that they are protected, although no installation actually takes place.

Meanwhile, victims that use other mobile operating systems are notified that their device does not require any additional security.

The Focus on Android

This discovery confirms that Man in the Mobile (MitMo) attacks are focusing primarily on Android devices. Multiple studies show that Android devices account for more than 60 percent of the smartphone market in the targeted countries (Spain, Portugal, Germany and the Netherlands). Android popularity and the relative ease of developing and distributing Android applications are probably the reasons why cyber criminals have singled out this particular platform for mobile malware attacks. Once fraudsters have infected a victim’s Web and mobile endpoints, very few security mechanisms can prevent fraud from occurring.

Today, criminals are compromising Android devices to circumvent out-of-band security mechanisms that send SMS messages to authorize both Web and mobile banking transactions. Going forward, we expect criminals to expand their attack tactics on mobile devices to mimic desktop attack techniques, including webinjection, key loggers and screen capture, among others.

More from Endpoint

Deploying Security Automation to Your Endpoints

Globally, data is growing at an exponential rate. Due to factors like information explosion and the rising interconnectivity of endpoints, data growth will only become a more pressing issue. This enormous influx of data will invariably affect security teams. Faced with an enormous amount of data to sift through, analysts are feeling the crunch. Subsequently, alert fatigue is already a problem for analysts overwhelmed with security tasks. With the continued shortage of qualified staff, organizations are looking for automation to…

Threat Management and Unified Endpoint Management

The worst of the pandemic may be behind us, but we continue to be impacted by it. School-aged kids are trying to catch up academically and socially after two years of disruption. Air travel is a mess. And all businesses have seen a spike in cyberattacks. Cyber threats increased by 81% while COVID-19 was at its peak, with 79% of all organizations experiencing a loss of business operations during that time. The risk of cyberattacks increased so much that the…

3 Ways EDR Can Stop Ransomware Attacks

Ransomware attacks are on the rise. While these activities are low-risk and high-reward for criminal groups, their consequences can devastate their target organizations. According to the 2022 Cost of a Data Breach report, the average cost of a ransomware attack is $4.54 million, without including the cost of the ransom itself. Ransomware breaches also took 49 days longer than the data breach average to identify and contain. Worse, criminals will often target the victim again, even after the ransom is…

How EDR Security Supports Defenders in a Data Breach

The cost of a data breach has reached an all-time high. It averaged $4.35 million in 2022, according to the newly published IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report. What’s more, 83% of organizations have faced more than one data breach, with just 17% saying this was their first data breach. What can organizations do about this? One solution is endpoint detection and response (EDR) software. Take a look at how an effective EDR solution can help your security teams. …