Analyst firm Gartner recently published a report titled, “Implement a Risk-Based Approach to Vulnerability Management.” It focused on a risk-based approach for a vulnerability management process and includes several statements and recommendations that our X-Force Red team strongly supports. Some of them include:

  • “A vulnerability is only as dangerous as the threat exploiting it.”
  • “Vulnerability rating schemes that don’t take into account what threat actors are leveraging in the wild can cause organizations to address less risky issues first.”
  • “Implement a risk-based approach that correlates asset value, the severity of vulnerabilities and threat actor activity via the use of threat intelligence and analytics to calculate a realistic risk rating.”
  • “Prioritizing treatment of vulnerabilities commonly targeted by exploit kits, malware, ransomware and threat actors, while also considering asset criticality and external exposure, will focus remediation on the elimination of imminent risks.”

How Can Security Teams Optimize the Vulnerability Management Process?

X-Force Red built X-Force Red Vulnerability Management Services (VMS) with these same methodologies in mind. One of the biggest challenges plaguing security teams worldwide is figuring out which vulnerabilities, out of hundreds of thousands that are uncovered daily, to remediate first.

With limited time and resources, security teams manually sift through each vulnerability, trying to decipher which one could cause the most harm to their organization. Many have relied on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), but those scores do not factor in the importance of an exposed asset, or whether the vulnerability is actively weaponized by criminals.

As a result, security teams often waste time following up on false positives and minimal risk vulnerabilities, while the most dangerous ones remained unpatched.

Inside X-Force Red’s Vulnerability Ranking Formula

X-Force Red set out to help organizations tackle the prioritization problem by focusing on the same key components covered in Gartner’s recent report: weaponization, severity and asset value. X-Force Red VMS includes automated ranking.

This image is from X-Force Red. It shows how X-Force Red VMS ranks vulnerabilities, with the most critical one being clearly stated on the top of the pyramid. The ranking is based on if the vulnerability is being weaponized, value of the exposed asset and criticality.

After a scan produces an extensive list of vulnerabilities, our proprietary analytics correlate the criticality, asset value and active exploits. We then automatically rank the vulnerabilities, prioritizing those that have been weaponized to expose a high-value asset. Whereas manual prioritization methods typically take four to five days to complete, our ranking is done within minutes, enabling remediation to begin immediately.

The core function of our ranking formula is prioritizing vulnerabilities by risk. A broken door on a safe is a serious vulnerability; a broken door on a safe with a burglar outside is a more serious vulnerability. We train your enterprise to start by securing the latter.

We apply that philosophy to every vulnerability we detect, and, based on its latest report, it’s clear Gartner shares that view.

Download the complete Gartner report

More from Software Vulnerabilities

FYSA – Critical RCE Flaw in GNU-Linux Systems

2 min read - Summary The first of a series of blog posts has been published detailing a vulnerability in the Common Unix Printing System (CUPS), which purportedly allows attackers to gain remote access to UNIX-based systems. The vulnerability, which affects various UNIX-based operating systems, can be exploited by sending a specially crafted HTTP request to the CUPS service. Threat Topography Threat Type: Remote code execution vulnerability in CUPS service Industries Impacted: UNIX-based systems across various industries, including but not limited to, finance, healthcare,…

X-Force discovers new vulnerabilities in smart treadmill

7 min read - This research was made possible thanks to contributions from Joshua Merrill. Smart gym equipment is seeing rapid growth in the fitness industry, enabling users to follow customized workouts, stream entertainment on the built-in display, and conveniently track their progress. With the multitude of features available on these internet-connected machines, a group of researchers at IBM X-Force Red considered whether user data was secure and, more importantly, whether there was any risk to the physical safety of users. One of the most…

X-Force releases detection & response framework for managed file transfer software

5 min read - How AI can help defenders scale detection guidance for enterprise software tools If we look back at mass exploitation events that shook the security industry like Log4j, Atlassian, and Microsoft Exchange when these solutions were actively being exploited by attackers, the exploits may have been associated with a different CVE, but the detection and response guidance being released by the various security vendors had many similarities (e.g., Log4shell vs. Log4j2 vs. MOVEit vs. Spring4Shell vs. Microsoft Exchange vs. ProxyShell vs.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today