Analyst firm Gartner recently published a report titled, “Implement a Risk-Based Approach to Vulnerability Management.” It focused on a risk-based approach for a vulnerability management process and includes several statements and recommendations that our X-Force Red team strongly supports. Some of them include:

  • “A vulnerability is only as dangerous as the threat exploiting it.”
  • “Vulnerability rating schemes that don’t take into account what threat actors are leveraging in the wild can cause organizations to address less risky issues first.”
  • “Implement a risk-based approach that correlates asset value, the severity of vulnerabilities and threat actor activity via the use of threat intelligence and analytics to calculate a realistic risk rating.”
  • “Prioritizing treatment of vulnerabilities commonly targeted by exploit kits, malware, ransomware and threat actors, while also considering asset criticality and external exposure, will focus remediation on the elimination of imminent risks.”

How Can Security Teams Optimize the Vulnerability Management Process?

X-Force Red built X-Force Red Vulnerability Management Services (VMS) with these same methodologies in mind. One of the biggest challenges plaguing security teams worldwide is figuring out which vulnerabilities, out of hundreds of thousands that are uncovered daily, to remediate first.

With limited time and resources, security teams manually sift through each vulnerability, trying to decipher which one could cause the most harm to their organization. Many have relied on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), but those scores do not factor in the importance of an exposed asset, or whether the vulnerability is actively weaponized by criminals.

As a result, security teams often waste time following up on false positives and minimal risk vulnerabilities, while the most dangerous ones remained unpatched.

Inside X-Force Red’s Vulnerability Ranking Formula

X-Force Red set out to help organizations tackle the prioritization problem by focusing on the same key components covered in Gartner’s recent report: weaponization, severity and asset value. X-Force Red VMS includes automated ranking.

This image is from X-Force Red. It shows how X-Force Red VMS ranks vulnerabilities, with the most critical one being clearly stated on the top of the pyramid. The ranking is based on if the vulnerability is being weaponized, value of the exposed asset and criticality.

After a scan produces an extensive list of vulnerabilities, our proprietary analytics correlate the criticality, asset value and active exploits. We then automatically rank the vulnerabilities, prioritizing those that have been weaponized to expose a high-value asset. Whereas manual prioritization methods typically take four to five days to complete, our ranking is done within minutes, enabling remediation to begin immediately.

The core function of our ranking formula is prioritizing vulnerabilities by risk. A broken door on a safe is a serious vulnerability; a broken door on a safe with a burglar outside is a more serious vulnerability. We train your enterprise to start by securing the latter.

We apply that philosophy to every vulnerability we detect, and, based on its latest report, it’s clear Gartner shares that view.

Download the complete Gartner report

More from Software Vulnerabilities

Dissecting and Exploiting TCP/IP RCE Vulnerability “EvilESP”

September’s Patch Tuesday unveiled a critical remote vulnerability in tcpip.sys, CVE-2022-34718. The advisory from Microsoft reads: “An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted IPv6 packet to a Windows node where IPsec is enabled, which could enable a remote code execution exploitation on that machine.” Pure remote vulnerabilities usually yield a lot of interest, but even over a month after the patch, no additional information outside of Microsoft’s advisory had been publicly published. From my side, it had been a…

Self-Checkout This Discord C2

This post was made possible through the contributions of James Kainth, Joseph Lozowski, and Philip Pedersen. In November 2022, during an incident investigation involving a self-checkout point-of-sale (POS) system in Europe, IBM Security X-Force identified a novel technique employed by an attacker to introduce a command and control (C2) channel built upon Discord channel messages. Discord is a chat, voice, and video service enabling users to join and create communities associated with their interests. While Discord and its related software…

Critical Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in SPNEGO Extended Negotiation Security Mechanism

In September 2022, Microsoft patched an information disclosure vulnerability in SPNEGO NEGOEX (CVE-2022-37958). On December 13, Microsoft reclassified the vulnerability as “Critical” severity after IBM Security X-Force Red Security Researcher Valentina Palmiotti discovered the vulnerability could allow attackers to remotely execute code. The vulnerability is in the SPNEGO Extended Negotiation (NEGOEX) Security Mechanism, which allows a client and server to negotiate the choice of security mechanism to use. This vulnerability is a pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability impacting a wide…

Containers, Security, and Risks within Containerized Environments

Applications have historically been deployed and created in a manner reminiscent of classic shopping malls. First, a developer builds the mall, then creates the various stores inside. The stores conform to the dimensions of the mall and operate within its floor plan. In older approaches to application development, a developer would have a targeted system or set of systems for which they intend to create an application. This targeted system would be the mall. Then, when building the application, they would…