Adverse Learning Conditions? Educational Hidden Tear Ransomware Gets 24 Not-So-Friendly Spinoffs

February 8, 2016 @ 9:25 AM
| |
2 min read

File this under “hardly surprising”: The educational, open-source ransomware created by Turkish security researcher Utku Sen has been spun off into 24 not-so-friendly variants including Magic, Linux.Encoder and Cryptear.B. While Sen was recently blackmailed into taking his Hidden Tear ransomware and follow-up project EDA2 off GitHub, this hasn’t stopped the spread of new iterations. Here’s a quick overview.

Hidden Tear Ransomware: Just Trying to Help?

As noted by SecurityWeek, Sen created his ransomware with a number of key flaws and limitations; for example, Hidden Tear would only encrypt files in a \test directory and wouldn’t work if the directory didn’t exist. Fundamental issues with encryption, meanwhile, meant that even malicious adaptations were no match for standard remediation techniques. But here’s the thing: Researchers from Kaspersky asserted that the InfoSec community already had a host of ransomware samples and didn’t really need an educational resource to help their learning curve.

SC Magazine pointed to the emergence of Hidden Tear ransomware variants and other open-source code as harbingers of “cheap and nasty ransomware” that attackers can pull from multiple sources, quickly adopt and then abandon when things go awry. Thankfully, much of it is little more than a nuisance.

For example, the author of Cryptolocker asked victims to email him for ransom demands, while the newly discovered Magic ransomware is demanding just one bitcoin to unlock its AES encryption — though no one has bothered to pay. There are a few more unpleasant varieties, however, such as Trojan-Ransom.MSIL.Tear.n, which encrypts user files but doesn’t bother with an encryption key, making it impossible to recover any data, according to Softpedia.

Open-Source Opportunities

Hidden Tear ransomware isn’t the only emerging open-source problem. As noted by Graham Cluley, a January 2016 malware attack on the Ukrainian electric power industry leveraged an open-source backdoor and caused a number of power outages and service interruptions. And last year, Gizmodo reported on the emergence of open-source bundles such as Tox, which creates a fully functioning — if rough around the edges — ransomware distributor.

The takeaway here? Educational malware isn’t necessary since companies have enough actual ransomware to analyze, and moderately skilled cybercriminals will turn the gift they’ve been offered into actual malware, flaws and all. Combined with other open-source code and prepackaged ransomware bundles, Hidden Tear signifies a market shift — encryption-based malware is quickly becoming an industry unto itself.

While this means more malicious code flooding corporate networks, it also comes with an unexpected bonus: standardization. Cybercriminals almost invariably opt for the cheapest, fastest solution, and right now that means prebuilt and open source.

InfoSec pros and security companies get a leg up because increasing code volume comes means a decrease in originality; finding and exploiting malware flaws becomes a matter of throughput rather than trial and error. Simply put? Poorly made malware means a smaller defensive learning curve.

Douglas Bonderud
Freelance Writer

A freelance writer for three years, Doug Bonderud is a Western Canadian with expertise in the fields of technology and innovation. In addition to working for...
read more