October 12, 2017 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

How do large internet entities such as internet service providers (ISPs), cloud providers and national networks communicate with each other? They use border gateway protocol (BGP).

The problem is that, as noted by Bleeping Computer, BGP security is lacking. The protocol was developed in the late 1980s, when data security wasn’t top of mind for emerging internet entities. As a result, BGP hijacks are now, as Wired put it, “the internet’s biggest security hole.” This prompted two government agencies — the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) — to team up and develop a new set of security standards to close border gateway loopholes.

Breaking Borders

So what’s in a BGP breach? The idea is to subvert BGP’s purpose. When one large network needs to route data to another, BGP tells routers which IP blocks are available on the destination network and which are the most reliable.

Fraudsters can compromise this process by advertising available IP blocks that don’t actually exist on legitimate networks. Data is then sent directly to attacker-controlled routers and servers.

Even worse, BGP lacks basic security services. Enterprises may not be aware that data security has been compromised because no errors would have been reported. Information is sent somewhere without incident — the destination is simply altered.

Joining Forces for BGP Security

NIST and DHS are no strangers to teaming up. As noted by the official NIST website, the two agencies are jointly sponsoring the 2018 Global City Teams Challenge, which aims to improve the security, resiliency and reliability of smart city systems.

For BGP security, NIST and DHS created the Secure Inter-Domain Routing (SIDR) framework, which has been in development for several years but just recently began rolling out on the Internet Engineerinng Task Force (ITEF) portal. To effectively secure BGP routing, SIDR leverages three components:

  • Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI). This allows providers that hold large blocks of internet addresses to stipulate which networks can announce a direct address block connection, reducing the chance of cybercriminal networks calling the shots.
  • BGP Origin Validation. Using RPKI information, routers can filter out route announcements that aren’t from authorized locations.
  • BGP Path Validation. Also called BGPsec, the idea here is to use digital router signatures to ensure that traffic only crosses authorized networks. This kind of path monitoring should help eliminate the ability of attackers to carry out undetected hijacks.

This isn’t a matter of scaling up existing BGP security — it’s about creating a solid foundation after the fact. The NIST/DHS effort gives organizations a starting point for BGP security that, if widely implemented, should help eliminate the majority of border gateway attacks.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today