April 28, 2020 By David Bisson 2 min read

Security researchers discovered that the new LeetHozer botnet shares some attack resources with the Moobot malware family.

The Network Research Lab at 360 found that the LeetHozer botnet had borrowed from the reporter and loader mechanism employed by Mirai. But this threat differed from other Mirai variations in that it made significant changes to the encryption method, bot program and command-and-control (C&C) communication protocol. It also employed the same downloader as well as a unique string in its vulnerability exploitation efforts as Moobot. In response to this observation, researchers posited that LeetHozer likely originated from the same organization or attacker responsible for creating Moobot.

The researchers found that the botnet began by exploiting a vulnerability to start the telnetd service in a targeted device. It then used the default password to log into the device. Upon completing this infection process, LeetHozer sent the device’s information to its reporter mechanism, reached out to its C&C server and waited for instructions to begin conducting a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack.

A Look at Moobot’s Emergence

Moobot has been involved in various attack campaigns since its discovery by the Network Research Lab at 360 in September 2019. In March 2020, for instance, the security firm’s detection systems flagged various threat groups abusing zero-day vulnerabilities in LILIN DVR devices to distribute the malware. It was just a month later when the researchers at 360 revealed that they had spotted Moobot abusing another zero-day security flaw as part of its exploit attempts to target fiber routers.

Defend Against the LeetHozer Botnet’s DDoS Attacks

Security professionals can help their organizations defend against DDoS attacks launched by the LeetHozer botnet and other threats like it by developing a robust incident response plan. They can then use this strategy to ensure that their organization’s backup services start up when an attack begins targeting the network. In addition, they should use solutions powered by artificial intelligence (AI) to help determine when an attack is underway.

More from

Exploiting GOG Galaxy XPC service for privilege escalation in macOS

7 min read - Being part of the Adversary Services team at IBM, it is important to keep your skills up to date and learn new things constantly. macOS security was one field where I decided to put more effort this year to further improve my exploitation and operation skills in macOS environments. During my research, I decided to try and discover vulnerabilities in software that I had pre-installed on my laptop, which resulted in the discovery of this vulnerability. In this article, I…

Taking the complexity out of identity solutions for hybrid environments

4 min read - For the past two decades, businesses have been making significant investments to consolidate their identity and access management (IAM) platforms and directories to manage user identities in one place. However, the hybrid nature of the cloud has led many to realize that this ultimate goal is a fantasy. Instead, businesses must learn how to consistently and effectively manage user identities across multiple IAM platforms and directories. As cloud migration and digital transformation accelerate at a dizzying pace, enterprises are left…

IBM identifies zero-day vulnerability in Zyxel NAS devices

12 min read - While investigating CVE-2023-27992, a vulnerability affecting Zyxel network-attached storage (NAS) devices, the IBM X-Force uncovered two new flaws, which when used together, allow for pre-authenticated remote code execution. Zyxel NAS devices are typically used by consumers as cloud storage devices for homes or small to medium-sized businesses. When used together, the flaws X-Force discovered allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device with superuser permissions and without requiring any credentials. This results in complete control over the…

What cybersecurity pros can learn from first responders

4 min read - Though they may initially seem very different, there are some compelling similarities between cybersecurity professionals and traditional first responders like police and EMTs. After all, in a world where a cyberattack on critical infrastructure could cause untold damage and harm, cyber responders must be ready for anything. But are they actually prepared? Compared to the readiness of traditional first responders, how do cybersecurity professionals in incident response stand up? Let’s dig deeper into whether the same sense of urgency exists…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today