December 14, 2017 By Mark Samuels 2 min read

No one can deny that information security made headlines this year, but those high-profile attacks don’t tell the whole story. According to recent research by Gartner, the major attacks and data breaches that enterprises experienced throughout 2017 are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to cybersecurity news.

Examining Cybersecurity News

The firm’s research director, Jeff Wheatman told TechRepublic that the next five to 10 years will see a new range of threats to corporate organizations. In fact, Gartner predicted that by 2021 an enterprise will suffer a business outage due to malware and ransomware that results in $1 billion in lost revenue.

Enterprises must consider how the dependencies that come with partnering with in an ever-growing pool of providers will affect their own cybersecurity. To avoid becoming the next piece of cybersecurity news, IT leaders must assess the security posture of their third-party providers.

Beware of the Ripple Effect

Digital transformation has led to a major shift in enterprise technology ecosystems. The posture of partner organizations becomes increasingly important as the ecosystem expands.

Wheatman noted that key partners are often connected to hundreds of other suppliers. While IT leaders will likely have no direct interaction with many of these companies, the security approach of these disparate organizations could have a huge impact on blue-chip businesses.

CIOs must understand the security posture of all potential partners as a matter of urgency. Gartner noted that major enterprises have been affected by attacks and breaches against their partners and by providers that work with their third-party vendors. This interconnectedness can create a ripple effect that could put major enterprises at risk.

Assessing the Security Posture of Partners

As more enterprises store data in the cloud, CIOs must be sure to understand the security posture of interconnected providers. According to Wheatman, Gartner has seen an increase in spending on security rating services. These services gather data and then run algorithms to assess enterprise cybersecurity, much like a credit rating is applied to a consumer. Investing in these services allows security leaders to understand the risk associated to partners operating within their extended ecosystems.

Making Smart Investments

The good news is that Gartner recently forecast that global security spending will total $96.3 billion next year, an 8 percent increase from 2017. Enterprises are spending more due to regulation concerns, emerging threats and evolution in digital business strategies.

IT decision-makers must clearly explain the risk of cybersecurity threats to senior stakeholders. They need to demonstrate how investing in information security reduces risk, improves governance and creates higher profits — and underscore that these practices need to be present in third parties as well.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today