October 1, 2015 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

What’s old is new again. At least, that’s the word on the street, according to Naked Security. It seems that macro malware — known 20 years ago as malware viruses — is making a comeback, hiding in Word documents and ready to ruin a perfectly decent workday. So why the sudden surge of interest, and what can companies do to avoid the curse of bad Word macros?

Up-and-Coming Malware

According to Softpedia, security companies are now detecting 50 to 100 malicious visual basic for applications (VBA) samples each month, making this a significant attack vector. But what’s the big risk in opening small document attachments?

It goes like this: Employees are now well-trained to never open random executable (.exe) files they receive via email but are often tasked with opening and reviewing countless Word documents each day. In fact, stopping to scan and dissect each one would likely result in corporate pushback as efficiency suffered and project timelines were thrown into disarray.

In other words, opening documents is no longer considered risky. But by adding just a line or two of VBA code, cybercriminals can trigger background downloads of .exe files without employee approval or IT knowledge. The result? According to Tech Target, there’s virtually no effort or monetary cost required to infect enterprise systems, unlike more complex methods that can take months to design and execute effectively.

Attackers have added a new layer of sophistication to macro attacks: time. Softpedia noted that instead of trying to force malicious code through devices as quickly as possible, VBA-based threats are now making strange calls to lesser-used system functions in “long and time-wasting loops.” This extended time frame makes antivirus programs much less likely to flag the program as malicious, both because the operations don’t seem dangerous and because, as time drags on, many antivirus programs stop scanning to save resources and limit performance drops, especially if the code in question doesn’t follow typical threat patterns.

Long Memory

It’s no surprise that companies are no longer worried about VBA code lurking in seemingly innocent documents since this threat vector reached its height in the late 1990s. It has been largely absent in the last two decades once businesses wised up and stopped opening unknown documents. The rise of sophisticated malware attacks, meanwhile, has pulled IT security in new directions; Tripwire noted that the GreenDispenser ATM malware has now been spotted in the wild, which allows attackers virtually unlimited access to bank machines.

BetaNews reported that on the same day Apple launched their El Capitan OS, details were published about an exploit that allowed attackers to bypass the company’s Gatekeeper security system. In other words, the massive malware market offers the perfect opportunity for malicious actors to dredge up old memories. With organizations focused on emerging threats, it’s easy to slip simple attacks past network defenses.

Word on the Street

With macro malware making a comeback, how do companies avoid getting hit by duplicitous documents? Employees are part of the solution: Senders must be verified and vetted before any documents are opened. On the IT side, meanwhile, admins are well-advised to disable macro capabilities when not needed, enable only signed or approved macros when required and limit the number of users allowed to log in with administrator or root privileges.

The curse of bad Words is making a comeback. Keeping systems clean means getting back to basics: Train employees well, limit access and don’t get duped by documents.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today