May 13, 2019 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Cryptocurrency exchange Binance lost $41 million after attackers compromised its “hot wallet” to grab more than 7000 bitcoin.

On Tuesday, May 7, Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, announced that malicious actors had compromised user application programming interface (API) keys and two-factor authentication (2FA) codes, enabling them to access the company’s hot wallet and steal more than 7,000 bitcoin (BTC). According to Coindesk, this resulted in the immediate suspension of all withdrawals and deposits, and Binance pledged to cover all customer losses using its emergency fund.

Along with immediate concerns the surrounding the Binance hack, this hot wallet heist has stoked the fire on another conversation: bitcoin rollbacks.

Behind the Binance Hack

Cryptocurrency thefts have already topped 1.2 billion this year as hackers ramp up targeted attacks on high-value exchanges like Binance. According to the company’s official statement, “The hackers had the patience to wait, and execute well-orchestrated actions through multiple seemingly independent accounts at the most opportune time.”

Using 44 individual transactions bundled together — likely designed to mimic typical exchange behavior — the attackers were able to withdraw 7,000 BTC. The withdrawal itself triggered security alarms, but Binance was unable to stop the transaction.

The firm noted that only 2 percent of its total bitcoin value was stolen, and all BTC in their offline “cold wallets” remains secure, but the incident has spurred debate about finding and redistributing the missing funds.

According to CCN, the stolen currency is now stored in seven anonymous wallets, prompting speculation about a blockchain reorganization or rollback. While theoretically possible, such a reorganization would undermine the uncensored, supply-capped nature of bitcoin and cause significant repercussions for the market at large. Fortunately, Binance didn’t suggest the idea and has no plans to initiate a rollback.

How Can Companies Protect Cryptocurrency Wallets?

Beyond breaking the blockchain network, how can companies reduce the risk of cryptocurrency hacks? First, it’s critical to deploy discrete security measures — such as 2FA and anomalous transaction detection — that are capable of blocking most attacks before they reach bitcoin wallets. Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao noted that “significant changes” are coming to its API, 2FA and withdrawal validation processes before the company resumes bitcoin business as usual.

Security experts also highlight the increasing need for a holistic security approach that includes test-driven development, standardized defensive techniques and improved regulation. As the Binance hack demonstrates, even small cracks in crypto security can break the bitcoin vault wide open for attackers.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today