October 9, 2020 By David Bisson 2 min read

A new peer-to-peer (P2P) botnet called FritzFrog has breached over 500 secure shell (SSH) servers, including those operated by a railway company and some well-known educational institutions in the U.S. and Europe.

FritzFrog was first discovered in January by Guardicore Labs. The security firm observed the botnet execute its malicious processes ‘ifconfig’ and ‘nginx.’ Researchers responded by launching an investigation into the threat.

In the process, they found that FritzFrog lacked any centralized command-and-control (C&C) infrastructure. The company subsequently developed a Golang-based client program they dubbed ‘frogger’ for the purpose of creating their own nodes and joining the P2P network. They observed a total of over 13,000 botnet attacks and 20 different binaries of the botnet malware within the FritzFrog’s network.

But, what does this actually mean?

How is FritzFrog Different From Other Botnets? 

The dissection of the botnet revealed several properties that set FritzFrog apart from other P2P botnets. Most notably, FritzFrog is fileless; it didn’t arrive with any working directory. Instead, it used binary large objects (BLOBs), which are binary data collections that load in memory as a single entity, to transfer and assemble its files. The threat included a map to track each BLOB along with its hash value. This enabled the malware to make the transfer of files stored on those BLOBs between different nodes.

It also used aggressive brute-force attacks based on an extensive dictionary against targets distributed evenly among nodes. Once it successfully compromised those machines, the threat proceeded to keep its databases of targets and breached machines up to date — all while using a P2P protocol that was completely proprietary.

Other Major P2P Botnets in 2020

These qualities set FritzFrog apart from other recent P2P botnets. In early April, Netlab 360 published its research on DDG, a botnet that first attracted the security firm’s attention in January 2018 for its efforts to mine for Monero. A new version emerged in January 2019. This variant arrived with a Memberlist-based P2P mechanism, making it one of the world’s first P2P-based cryptomining botnets.

A few days later in April, Mozi emerged. At the time of analysis, this malware consisted of the source code borrowed from the Gafgyt, Mirai and IoT Reaper botnets. Mozi differentiated itself from these threats by rejecting centralized C&C infrastructure and opting for a P2P network. It used this architecture to mainly target home routers and DVRs in order to launch distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, exfiltrate data and execute payloads.

How to Defend Against P2P Botnets

Botnets with P2P networks are difficult to shut down. In the absence of centralized C&C infrastructure, infected bots can continue to relay instructions to one another even if large swaths of the botnet go down.

Acknowledging this reality, organizations should take it upon themselves to defend their Internet of things (IoT) devices against botnet malware like FritzFrog. They can do so first by investing in an incident response team responsible for investigating potential compromises. This team can also oversee the vulnerability management process on the organization’s smart products. Simultaneously, the organization should commit itself to upholding IoT security best practices by having its security teams regularly review the configurations of its IoT devices and change the admin passwords for each device.

More from

Exploring the 2024 Worldwide Managed Detection and Response Vendor Assessment

3 min read - Research firm IDC recently released its 2024 Worldwide Managed Detection and Response Vendor Assessment, which both highlights leaders in the market and examines the evolution of MDR as a critical component of IT security infrastructure. Here are the key takeaways. The current state of MDR According to the assessment, “the MDR market has evolved extensively over the past couple of years. This should be seen as a positive movement as MDR providers have had to evolve to meet the growing…

Regulatory harmonization in OT-critical infrastructure faces hurdles

3 min read - In an effort to enhance cyber resilience across critical infrastructure, the Office of the National Cyber Director (ONCD) has recently released a summary of feedback from its 2023 Cybersecurity Regulatory Harmonization Request for Information (RFI). The responses reveal major concerns from critical infrastructure industries related to operational technology (OT), such as energy, transport and manufacturing. Their worries include the current fragmented regulatory landscape and difficulty adapting to new cyber regulations. The frustration appears to be unanimous. Meanwhile, the magnitude of…

Generative AI security requires a solid framework

4 min read - How many companies intentionally refuse to use AI to get their work done faster and more efficiently? Probably none: the advantages of AI are too great to deny.The benefits AI models offer to organizations are undeniable, especially for optimizing critical operations and outputs. However, generative AI also comes with risk. According to the IBM Institute for Business Value, 96% of executives say adopting generative AI makes a security breach likely in their organization within the next three years.CISA Director Jen…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today