February 9, 2018 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Secure sockets layer (SSL) encryption has become synonymous with network traffic security. Bolstered by the backing of search giant Google and other tech companies, SSL-based traffic leveraging HTTPS connections rose sharply through 2017.

As noted by the recent Google Transparency Report, almost 80 percent of all pages loaded in Chrome over the past two months used HTTPS. The problem is that fraudsters are now turning the tables and creating cybersecurity threats that rely on SSL to bypass corporate protections and infiltrate networks undetected.

Flipping the Script

According to data from Zscaler, the security firm’s threat detection tools blocked 30 percent more SSL-based attacks over the last six months, and SSL-delivered phishing attacks rose 300 percent through 2017.

What’s causing the sudden upswing? It’s largely due to cybercriminals’ realization that companies often assume SSL traffic is secure. It’s also easier than ever to obtain legitimate SSL certificates.

So it was only a matter of time before attackers flipped the script and started using SSL to carry malicious code. The rapid uptick in HTTPS connections over the past year offered the perfect fit.

Cybersecurity Threats From the Bottom of the Barrel

Many enterprises treat SSL traffic as the bottom of threat barrel since most SSL traffic comes from legitimate sources. This creates a blind spot for IT security: If fraudsters can hide malicious code in SSL, it gets only a cursory look from network security tools.

Alone, this wouldn’t be enough to compromise corporate systems, since advanced firewalls defend against fake digital certificates. But thanks to the rise of free and low-cost SSL certificates designed to encourage the widespread adoption of data encryption, cybercriminals can also get their hands on legitimate digital credentials to slip past even more vigilant IT defenses.

As noted by SecurityWeek, attackers are now using SSL-encrypted channels to deliver malvertising and phishing efforts, distribute malware payloads and connect infected hosts with command-and-control (C&C) servers. In other words, they’ve simply picked up standard operations and moved them behind SSL curtains.

Certified Concern

Incoming SSL traffic isn’t the only issue companies face as encryption becomes standard practice. Threat researcher Jason Reaves of Fidelis Security uncovered a flaw in the way SSL/transport layer security (TLS) certificates are exchanged that could allow malicious actors to develop new cybersecurity threats.

Certificates are exchanged during the TLS handshake and before the secure connection is made. Reaves discovered a system that could send and receive data from clients and servers during this phase, and potentially bypass detection methods that don’t inspect certificate values.

So far, the vulnerability affects public key certificate standard X.509. While there’s no evidence of exploits in the wild, the discovery speaks to the need for stricter SSL security protocols. Encryption alone doesn’t guarantee safe traffic.

 

More from

Hive0137 and AI-supplemented malware distribution

12 min read - IBM X-Force tracks dozens of threat actor groups. One group in particular, tracked by X-Force as Hive0137, has been a highly active malware distributor since at least October 2023. Nominated by X-Force as having the “Most Complex Infection Chain” in a campaign in 2023, Hive0137 campaigns deliver DarkGate, NetSupport, T34-Loader and Pikabot malware payloads, some of which are likely used for initial access in ransomware attacks. The crypters used in the infection chains also suggest a close relationship with former…

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

Crisis communication: What NOT to do

4 min read - Read the 1st blog in this series, Cybersecurity crisis communication: What to doWhen an organization experiences a cyberattack, tensions are high, customers are concerned and the business is typically not operating at full capacity. Every move you make at this point makes a difference to your company’s future, and even a seemingly small mistake can cause permanent reputational damage.Because of the stress and many moving parts that are involved, businesses often fall short when it comes to communication in a crisis.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today