May 23, 2018 By Shane Schick 2 min read

Eighty-five percent of security professionals believe cybersecurity threats will lead to an attack on major critical infrastructure over the next five years, according to a recent survey. The annual Pwnie Express study, The Internet of Evil Things, polled approximately 500 security professionals about a range of cybersecurity threats, including malware and devices connected as part of the Internet of Things (IoT).

Cybersecurity vs. Online Evil

The research looked at the variety of industry sectors that might be least prepared for an attack. Health care topped the list at 51 percent — but was followed closely by the waste and wastewater sectors (47 percent) and the energy sector (43 percent).

Security professionals may be predicting major attacks on critical infrastructure because they’re already dealing with so many issues in their own organizations. Malware attacks affected 59 percent of those polled, for example. Additionally, 32 percent were impacted by ransomware. More serious cybersecurity threats — specifically distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks — struck 30 percent.

Security Professionals Still Lack the Right Tools

Perhaps more worryingly, security professionals suggested they aren’t necessarily strengthening their defenses — even after grappling directly with some of the most serious cybersecurity threats. While WannaCry affected 21 percent of those surveyed, for instance, approximately 18 percent said they still lack the tools to deal with the ransomware cryptoworm. Fourteen percent weren’t sure one way or the other. There were similar findings about other well-known malware and ransomware strains, including NotPetya, Locky and Mirai.

The gaps between the risks and the capability to deal with them weren’t limited to specific malware — it spread to entire areas of data protection. While a majority of 80 percent said they are concerned about cybersecurity threats as a result of bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies in the workplace, less than half said they had real-time monitoring tools for personal devices.

About the same percentage said they were worried about the risk inherent in IoT-connected smart devices, but only 23 percent claimed to be keeping track of such devices effectively. Overall, while 64 percent said they are more concerned about the security of connected devices than they were last year, the authors said there was no improvement in the frequency at which they’re checking them.

More from

CISA warns about credential access in FY23 risk & vulnerability assessment

3 min read - CISA released its Fiscal Year 2023 (FY23) Risk and Vulnerability Assessments (RVA) Analysis, providing a crucial look into the tactics and techniques threat actors employed to compromise critical infrastructure. The report is part of the agency’s ongoing effort to improve national cybersecurity through assessments of vulnerabilities in key sectors. Meanwhile, IBM’s X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2024 has identified credential access as one of the most significant risks to organizations.Both reports shed light on the persistent and growing threat of credential…

Are we getting better at quantifying risk management?

4 min read - As cyber threats grow more sophisticated and pervasive, the need for effective risk management has never been greater. The challenge lies not only in defining risk mitigation strategy but also in quantifying risk in ways that resonate with business leaders. The ability to translate complex technical risks into understandable and actionable business terms has become a crucial component of securing the necessary resources for cybersecurity programs.What approach do companies use today for cyber risk quantification? And how has cyber risk…

Trends: Hardware gets AI updates in 2024

4 min read - The surge in artificial intelligence (AI) usage over the past two and a half years has dramatically changed not only software but hardware as well. As AI usage continues to evolve, PC makers have found in AI an opportunity to improve end-user devices by offering AI-specific hardware and marketing them as "AI PCs."Pre-AI hardware, adapted for AIA few years ago, AI often depended on hardware that was not explicitly designed for AI. One example is graphics processors. Nvidia Graphics Processing…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today