January 5, 2016 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

It all started on Dec. 26: Cloud hosting provider Linode reported a series of DDoS attacks affecting its Linode Manager and website, according to SecurityWeek. Infrastructure was also targeted, but in a few hours, the company’s IT teams had everything under control.

Until the next day. So began a 10-day series of continuing attacks that left most of Linode’s services slow or unresponsive. The company has since resolved these issues, but is it possible to mitigate this kind of DDoS damage going forward, or are cloud providers forever at the mercy of denial-based storms?

Common Theme

The distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack is a common vector for cybercriminals since it’s often the easiest means to an end: Malicious actors compromise a large number of devices, then have them all attempt simultaneous, high-traffic connections. Targeted servers may slow to a crawl as CPUs attempt to keep up or fail altogether if overwhelmed.

In some cases, the threat of DDoS attacks are used to compel action or demonstrate security weakness. For example, the hacking group Phantom Squad threatened to take down the PSN and Xbox Live gaming networks on Christmas to showcase poor IT security practices. While there were some minor service hiccups during the holidays, it seems the group was either unsuccessful or simply chose a new target. Linode, unfortunately, did not fare so well.

A Poor Present

As noted by SC Magazine, the Christmas attacks on Linode caused “service interruptions at DNS infrastructure and data center locations in the U.S. and the U.K., including Dallas, London, Atlanta, Frankfurt, Newark, N.J., Tokyo, Singapore and Fremont, Calif.” What’s more, they occurred just after maintenance on Xen Linode host servers and came with no warning. No group has stepped forward to claim responsibility or demand any kind of action from the cloud provider.

Instead, the company was hit by attack after attack and was criticized for a lack of response to the issue at hand. By New Year’s Eve, Linode network engineer Alex Forster posted a detailed article about the hack, noting that in six days, the company had endured 30 different attacks that switched vectors each time Linode closed a security hole. According to The Register, as of Jan. 4, the cloud provider was finally back on track, with only one server in Atlanta listing a partial outage.

Takeaways From the DDoS Attacks

For cloud providers, the Linode attack is an uncomfortable reminder that the massive attack surface presented by servers and infrastructure makes cloud offerings a tempting target for DDoS attacks. Sheer request volume can quickly overwhelm even high-traffic servers, and the results are often unpredictable. As problems spread from the back end to specific tenants, they spill over into other client instances, turning a complex situation into complete chaos.

Best bet? Linode offers a good example: Hunker down and start closing holes. While this is no guarantee that attackers will shut things down and walk away, it’s often the quickest and most effective way to mitigate the impact of distributed attacks. As Forster’s blog post demonstrated, however, companies can’t afford to ignore their public face even when fighting private battles. Whenever possible, it’s important to provide a kind of play-by-play — an active report on what’s happening and what’s being done to counter the issue.

Short and sweet? No company is immune to DDoS attacks, and in the cloud, these storms have far-reaching impacts.

More from

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

DOD establishes Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy

2 min read - The federal government recently took a new step toward prioritizing cybersecurity and demonstrating its commitment to reducing risk. On March 20, 2024, the Pentagon formally established the new Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy to supervise cyber policy for the Department of Defense. The next day, President Joe Biden announced Michael Sulmeyer as his nominee for the role.“In standing up this office, the Department is giving cyber the focus and attention that Congress intended,” said Acting…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today