April 3, 2015 By Shane Schick 2 min read

Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks are bad enough already, shutting down sites or making them unusable. But officials are now warning that a multicast Domain Name System (DNS) vulnerability could make them far worse.

According to an advisory released on the CERT Knowledgebase, the multicast DNS vulnerability stems from a misconfiguration in some devices whereby the multicast DNS protocol responds to outside queries from the Internet rather than local queries from devices or services on the same network. That means cybercriminals could use the length of time for DNS responses using multicast DNS to amplify DDoS attacks. The multicast DNS vulnerability also means cybercriminals could potentially discover a lot of information about particular devices on a network, which could make it easier than ever to plot a cyberattack.

Chad Seaman, the researcher who discovered the multicast DNS vulnerability, wrote on GitHub that more than 100,000 devices could be affected and that DDoS traffic that exploits it could get a boost of nearly 1,000 percent. Even worse, this flaw could help better disguise DDoS attacks, making it harder for law enforcement agencies to track down perpetrators.

A story on ITworld pointed out that while other protocols — including the Simple Network Management Protocol and Network Time Protocol — have been used to boost the performance of DDoS attacks, the multicast DNS vulnerability needs further investigation to determine the software and devices that would respond to requests using it. However, a wide range of hardware products from well-known vendors were all among those potentially at risk.

According to Security Affairs, several vendors are already working on fixes, and there will undoubtedly be patches made available before too long. However, given the use of DDoS attacks on such high-profile targets as Sony Pictures Entertainment, this is the type of hole security professionals cannot afford to leave unfilled for long. In fact, a recent study on the subject showed DDoS attacks can cost $148,500 per hour, according to ZDNet.

On the plus side, stemming the possible damage could boil down to blocking a particular port, Port 5353, Threatpost said. This is where traffic could move between devices and services and where data could be leaked or attacks could originate. Enterprises may want to at least look into this as a first step as they assess their particular degree of exposure to the multicast DNS vulnerability.

Image Source: iStock

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today