November 25, 2019 By David Bisson 2 min read

A malicious downloader known as DePriMon uses the “Windows Default Print Monitor” name to avoid detection on Windows machines.

Active since at least 2017, DePriMon attracted the attention of ESET after infecting a private company based in Central Europe along with dozens of computers in the Middle East. The security firm subsequently examined the malicious downloader and learned a great deal about the threat’s second and third stages. Even so, researchers weren’t able to weigh in on DePriMon’s compromise vector(s) or what it uses for its final payload at the time of writing.

In the second stage of its infection chain, DePriMon abuses its system privileges to download the third-stage DLL to memory as a port monitor by creating a registry key. The threat thereby became the first documented malware family to leverage port monitors, an installation technique described in the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Once loaded, the third stage downloaded DePriMon’s final payload(s) from its operators.

Ties to the Longhorn Threat Actor

ESET detected ColoredLambert malware on a few of the computers infected by this most recent malicious downloader. As it turns out, ColoredLambert is just one of the members of the Lambert family. According to Kaspersky Lab, the Longhorn advanced threat actor has been using this suite of malware with zero-day vulnerability attacks since at least 2014. When Symantec investigated Longhorn, they found that many of its tools have been in use since 2011, some of which even appeared in the Vault 7 leak.

Defending Against a Fileless Malicious Downloader

Security professionals can help defend their organizations against fileless malicious downloaders like DePriMon by disabling PowerShell and other Windows processes if they are not needed. Otherwise, attackers can abuse these processes to infect the network with malware without raising any red flags. Companies should also invest in creating a robust security awareness training program that can educate employees about some of the most common social engineering attacks used by cybercriminals to distribute threats like DePriMon.

More from

We are moving!

< 1 min read - SecurityIntelligence.com is being sunset, but have no fear!We have a new home for all of your favorite security and X-Force content.Follow us to www.ibm.com/think to maintain access to the stories and news you love, both new and old.Security Intelligence will officially sunset on Friday, March 28, 2025. To access the latest security thought leadership, go here. To access the latest X-Force research, go here.If you are experiencing cybersecurity issues or an incident, contact X-Force® to help:US hotline: 1-888-241-9812 | Global hotline:…

Bypassing Windows Defender Application Control with Loki C2

10 min read - Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) is a security solution that restricts execution to trusted software. Since it is classified as a security boundary, Microsoft offers bug bounty payouts for qualifying bypasses, making it an active and competitive field of research.Typical outcomes of a WDAC bypass bug bounty submission:Bypass is fixed; possible bounty awardedBypass is not fixed but instead "mitigated" by being added to the WDAC recommended block list. Likely no bounty awarded but honorable mention is typically givenBypass is not…

FYSA — VMware Critical Vulnerabilities Patched

< 1 min read - SummaryBroadcom has released a security bulletin, VMSA-2025-0004, addressing and remediating three vulnerabilities that, if exploited, could lead to system compromise. Products affected include vCenter Server, vRealize Operations Manager, and vCloud Director.Threat TopographyThreat Type: Critical VulnerabilitiesIndustry: VirtualizationGeolocation: GlobalOverviewX-Force Incident Command is monitoring activity surrounding Broadcom’s Security Bulletin (VMSA-2025-0004) for three potentially critical vulnerabilities in VMware products. These vulnerabilities, identified as CVE-2025-22224, CVE-2025-22225, and CVE-2025-22226, have reportedly been exploited in attacks. X-Force has not been able to validate those claims. The vulnerabilities…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today