June 15, 2017 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

The cloud is naturally disruptive, driving significant change in the way companies leverage, process and utilize data. Emerging cloud security needs have also disrupted the ways in which IT teams track and respond to potential breaches.

While cloud-based tools can help improve response times and offer increased visibility, Help Net Security noted that the rise of cloud collaboration tools such as Slack and HipChat are putting pressure on data loss prevention (DLP) policies. In fact, 10 percent of all policy problems now stem from these tools. How can enterprises account for the potential danger of collaboration violations?

Slacking Off?

According to Beta News, a new study from cloud security firm Netskope put collaboration tools into its own data loss prevention (DLP) violation category instead of lumping them in with other common types. As a result, cloud collaboration software accounts for 9.8 percent of all violations. Webmail leads the pack with 43.3 percent of violations, followed by cloud storage at just over 30 percent.

But Sanjay Beri, CEO of Netskope, noted that “collaboration services are quickly displacing more traditional ways of communication and collaboration like email, and that means that more data is being shared inside those services.”

Looking at the activity breakdown of DLP violations backs up this assertion: 65 percent stem from data uploads, while 17.5 percent are attributed to sent data. As users become more comfortable with cloud collaboration tools, they’re inclined to upload and send more information, some of which lies outside the acceptable scope of DLP policies.

The Bigger Cloud Security Picture

DLP policies are critical aspects of effective cloud security. Employees need clear direction about how data can be used, shared and modified on corporate networks. The rise of cloud collaboration tools demands a shift in these policies to account for changing employee use habits and to ensure that these tools aren’t written off as inherently secure just because they’re part of internal corporate networks.

But that’s just scratching the surface. Consider the rollout of the EU’s new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which has a full compliance deadline less than a year away. According to eSecurity Planet, 90 percent of companies surveyed said they “anticipate challenges in complying with GDPR.” Specifically, 55 percent expect problems with Article 30, which compels companies to identify personal information on their systems, understand who has access to it and who is accessing it, and know when this data should be deleted.

Half of those surveyed, meanwhile, indicated that Article 32 presents a problem. It demands least privileged access, accountability via data owners, and regular reports that demonstrate the existence and success rate of data management policies.

Collaboration tools now play an essential role in cloud security. As cloud collaboration tools become the de facto preference for users to upload, share and modify data, enterprises must design policies to address these tools specifically and lay out clear expectations for data use. Strong DLP polices with collaboration-specific wording are now a priority for businesses, both to ensure local security and to meet evolving data protection expectations.

More from

Unpacking the NIST cybersecurity framework 2.0

4 min read - The NIST cybersecurity framework (CSF) helps organizations improve risk management using common language that focuses on business drivers to enhance cybersecurity.NIST CSF 1.0 was released in February 2014, and version 1.1 in April 2018. In February 2024, NIST released its newest CSF iteration: 2.0. The journey to CSF 2.0 began with a request for information (RFI) in February 2022. Over the next two years, NIST engaged the cybersecurity community through analysis, workshops, comments and draft revision to refine existing standards…

What should Security Operations teams take away from the IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index?

3 min read - The IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index has been released. The headlines are in and among them are the fact that a global identity crisis is emerging. X-Force noted a 71% increase year-to-year in attacks using valid credentials.In this blog post, I’ll explore three cybersecurity recommendations from the Threat Intelligence Index, and define a checklist your Security Operations Center (SOC) should consider as you help your organization manage identity risk.The report identified six action items:Remove identity silosReduce the risk of…

Obtaining security clearance: Hurdles and requirements

3 min read - As security moves closer to the top of the operational priority list for private and public organizations, needing to obtain a security clearance for jobs is more commonplace. Security clearance is a prerequisite for a wide range of roles, especially those related to national security and defense.Obtaining that clearance, however, is far from simple. The process often involves scrutinizing one’s background, financial history and even personal character. Let’s briefly explore some of the hurdles, expectations and requirements of obtaining a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today