The Pentagon plans to implement a zero trust architecture across its entire enterprise by 2027, according to DoD CIO John Sherman.

“What we’re aiming for is by 2027 to have zero trust deployed across the majority of our enterprise systems in the Department of Defense in five years,” Sherman said at a recent FedTalks keynote presentation. “That’s an ambitious goal for those of you familiar with zero trust, but the adversary capability we’re facing leaves us no choice but to move at that level of pace.”

Here’s a look at what the Pentagon’s zero trust initiative will entail and how the U.S. government plans to face the new reality of perimeter-less security.

Implementing Zero Trust for Millions

The Pentagon plans to roll out zero trust at scale for their enterprise of over four million people by 2027. This ambitious plan is based upon the continued rising threat of attacks from individuals, cyber gangs and state actors.

Meanwhile, Commander Gen. Jackie Van Ovost of the U.S. Transportation Command announced that her organization is already at work. “Last month, we completed our implementation of our core zero trust capabilities on our classified network, reaching the baseline maturity level,” said Van Ovost.

Explore Zero Trust Solutions  

Zero Trust for the Entire U.S. Government

The DoD announcement is far from unique. In January 2022, the Executive Office of the President released an announcement about government-wide zero trust goals. Clearly, the U.S. Government places high confidence in the approach and intends to embrace it as soon as possible.

“In the current threat environment, the Federal Government can no longer depend on conventional perimeter-based defenses to protect critical systems and data,” the memo states. “Incremental improvements will not give us the security we need; instead, the Federal Government needs to make bold changes and significant investments to defend the vital institutions that underpin the American way of life.”

The White House states that transitioning to a zero trust approach will provide a defensible architecture for new environments. In addition, the government says it will require agencies to meet specific zero trust objectives within the next few years.

The Current Threat Environment “Leaves Us No Choice”

In today’s reality, remote work and connected devices are commonplace. A company’s tech stack regularly expands with new tools and applications. Even if they tried, enterprises can no longer define a perimeter to protect.

Now security must be verified for every app, user, software and device. With zero trust, all requests are assumed to be unauthorized until proven otherwise. Instead of a single technology, zero trust uses multiple strategies, such as multi-factor authentication, micro-segmentation and AI-driven contextual analytics.

Organizations that turn to zero trust realize 20.5% lower costs for a data breach than those not using zero trust. In fact, companies with zero trust deployed saved nearly $1 million in average breach costs compared to those without it.

DoD CIO Sherman said the current threat environment “leaves us no choice.” The answer that many are turning to is zero trust.

More from News

The White House on Quantum Encryption and IoT Labels

A recent White House Fact Sheet outlined the current and future U.S. cybersecurity priorities. While most of the topics covered were in line with expectations, others drew more attention. The emphasis on critical infrastructure protection is clearly a top national priority. However, the plan is to create a labeling system for IoT devices, identifying the ones with the highest cybersecurity standards. Few expected that news. The topic of quantum-resistant encryption reveals that such concerns may become a reality sooner than…

Malware-as-a-Service Flaunts Its Tally of Users and Victims

As time passes, the security landscape keeps getting stranger and scarier. How long did the “not if, but when” mentality towards cyberattacks last — a few years, maybe? Now, security pros think in terms of how often will their organization be attacked and at what cost. Or they consider how the difference between legitimate Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) brands and Malware-as-a-Service (MaaS) gangs keeps getting blurrier. MaaS operators provide web-based services, slick UX, tiered subscriptions, newsletters and Telegram channels that keep users…

New Survey Shows Burnout May Lead to Attrition

For many organizations and the cybersecurity industry as a whole, improving retention and reducing the skills gap is a top priority. Mimecast’s The State of Ransomware Readiness 2022: Reducing the Personal and Business Cost points to another growing concern — burnout that leads to attrition. Without skilled employees, organizations cannot protect their data and infrastructure from increasing cybersecurity attacks. According to Mimecast’s report, 77% of cybersecurity leaders say the number of cyberattacks against their company has increased or stayed the…

Alleged FBI Database Breach Exposes Agents and InfraGard

Recently the feds suffered a big hack, not once, but twice. First, the FBI-run InfraGard program suffered a breach. InfraGard aims to strengthen partnerships with the private sector to share information about cyber and physical threats. That organization experienced a major breach in early December, according to a KrebsOnSecurity report. Allegedly, the InfraGard database — containing contact information of over 80,000 members — appeared up for sale on a cyber crime forum. Also, the hackers have reportedly been communicating with…