September 25, 2014 By Shane Schick 2 min read

Online ads can be annoying, distracting and occasionally intriguing, but they should never be something Web surfers have to fear. Late last week, however, Jerome Segura, senior security researcher for Malwarebytes, published a blog post reporting that DoubleClick and Zedo, two of the world’s largest ad networks, were serving online ads that could install Zemot, a piece of malware that connects to remote servers and installs even more malicious software.

The attack works by directing unsuspecting users to websites that host an exploit kit called Nuclear, which runs on older versions of Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser or Adobe Systems’ Flash. If it detects them, Zemot is used to target and infect those devices.

In its report on the online ad attack, Ars Technica described Zemot as a “beachhead” of cybercriminal activity, potentially unleashing a Pandora’s box of Trojans that steal personal information or spambots that render computers nearly useless.

DoubleClick, which is owned by Google, immediately severed its connection to Zedo, effectively stopping the malware from spreading, it told Ars Technica. However, Segura estimated the attack could have affected millions of computers.

‘Malvertising’ Hits Malware Scene With DoubleClick

As an article on Tom’s Guide pointed out, so-called “malvertising” is on the rise. Besides Doubleclick, other examples include a network called Kyle and Stan, which managed to use online ads on nearly 6,500 domains, including well-known sites such as YouTube and Amazon.

The online ad attack will be of concern to any chief information security officer who works for a company whose website uses online ad networks (which is nearly everyone). Ad networks such as DoubleClick act as a sort of middleman between advertisers that want to reach specific targets and online properties that have excess or unsold inventory on their domains.

Malvertising is scary because it goes largely undetected by the sites serving the ads — in this case, the domains distributing the malware included streaming radio service Last.fm and newspapers such as the Jerusalem Post and the Times of Israel — and potentially the ad networks themselves, such as DoubleClick. If more consumers start installing ad blockers in response to these sorts of attacks, it could threaten what could be an important incremental revenue stream.

In fact, a report from Blue Coat Systems published in March said malvertising has overtaken pornography as the No. 1 malware threat on mobile devices, with activity tripling since it began tracking the problem two years ago.

Of course, the best recourse is for consumers to ensure their machines are running nothing but patched, up-to-date software. If nothing else, the attention this attack has received will hopefully act as a sort of massive online ad campaign to convince them to do so.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today