How do Web users know they’re not getting scammed? While there are no absolutes online, it’s common practice to look for the green padlock symbol next to a site’s URL: If it’s there, the site uses SSL/TLS certificates to safeguard user data. According to Naked Security, however, fraudsters have now obtained legitimate digital certificates from major certificate authorities (CAs), which they’re using to dupe visitors into giving up personal information. Has the green padlock become just another tool for scammers?

Reeling in Victims With Digital Certificates

Here’s the best-case scenario for phishers: Create a website that seems legitimate, usually by slightly misspelling the name of a popular bank or service and then pasting familiar logos and login buttons across the page to convince users the site is above-board. Security has improved, with in-browser defenses and more tech-savvy users leading to a much tougher market for phishers — they cast just as much but reel in far, far less.

Part of the user vetting process, however, is checking for SSL/TLS certificates. If a site displays the green padlock, it must be doing something right. Right?

According to CSO Online, not always. Enterprising scam artists have taken their fraudulent websites to CAs in hopes of passing muster and being granted certificates. Critical oversight should stop these fraudsters from getting the green light. But U.K. network monitoring company Netcraft said that in just one month, major CAs have issued hundreds of SSL certificates to deceptive domain names. What gives?

Placing Blame

Netcraft points the finger at major CAs like Symantec, GoDaddy, Comodo and CloudFlare for doing a poor job of vetting potential applicants. Some should be easy marks — domains like and are clearly meant to reel in potential victims.

Others aren’t so obvious, but CAs are supposed to apply the same level of diligence no matter the applicant or the type of certificate. The easiest to obtain are domain-validated (DV) certificates, which cost around $10 and only require CAs to check that applicants own the domain they intend to use.

The problem? A combination of automated issuing processes and lax controls — such as simply sending an email to the domain administrator on file — make it easy for scammers to sneak through the gaps. Trell Rohovit of startup CA Hydrant ID told CSO Online that this means “a bad guy only has to beat one process/person/or email and — puff — your brand just flew out the proverbial Internet window.”

In theory, DVs with suspicious names are supposed to undergo more thorough vetting, and rogue CAs should be revoked once reported. But supposed to and should are cold comfort for users scammed by sites carrying the padlock logo since encryption doesn’t equal safety when it’s not possible to confirm who’s running the show at the other end.

Cert Uncertainty

With digital certificates now big business — and initiatives like Let’s Encrypt now rolling out free certificates in an effort to encrypt the Web — the rise of SSL/TLS scammers poses a real problem for Web security at large. As it stands, CAs are the weak link in the chain; the green padlock only has meaning when not just anyone has access to the key.

There are two ways for this to go: a revamp of existing cert procedures to safeguard users and boost the reputation of SSL/TLS certificates, or an evolution of Web security that puts the onus on browsers and users to ensure their safety rather than relying on certificate middlemen.

More from

How Do You Plan to Celebrate National Computer Security Day?

In October 2022, the world marked the 19th Cybersecurity Awareness Month. October might be over, but employers can still talk about awareness of digital threats. We all have another chance before then: National Computer Security Day. The History of National Computer Security Day The origins of National Computer Security Day trace back to 1988 and the Washington, D.C. chapter of the Association for Computing Machinery’s Special Interest Group on Security, Audit and Control. As noted by National Today, those in…

Abuse of Privilege Enabled Long-Term DIB Organization Hack

From November 2021 through January 2022, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) responded to an advanced cyberattack on a Defense Industrial Base (DIB) organization’s enterprise network. During that time frame, advanced persistent threat (APT) adversaries used an open-source toolkit called Impacket to breach the environment and further penetrate the organization’s network. Even worse, CISA reported that multiple APT groups may have hacked into the organization’s network. Data breaches such as these are almost always the result of compromised endpoints…

Deploying Security Automation to Your Endpoints

Globally, data is growing at an exponential rate. Due to factors like information explosion and the rising interconnectivity of endpoints, data growth will only become a more pressing issue. This enormous influx of data will invariably affect security teams. Faced with an enormous amount of data to sift through, analysts are feeling the crunch. Subsequently, alert fatigue is already a problem for analysts overwhelmed with security tasks. With the continued shortage of qualified staff, organizations are looking for automation to…

Worms of Wisdom: How WannaCry Shapes Cybersecurity Today

WannaCry wasn't a particularly complex or innovative ransomware attack. What made it unique, however, was its rapid spread. Using the EternalBlue exploit, malware could quickly move from device to device, leveraging a flaw in the Microsoft Windows Server Message Block (SMB) protocol. As a result, when the WannaCry "ransomworm" hit networks in 2017, it expanded to wreak havoc on high-profile systems worldwide. While the discovery of a "kill switch" in the code blunted the spread of the attack and newly…