Ethereum, a system for decentralized applications that uses blockchain, has hit a rough patch. The company recently dealt with a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack.

Ethereum DDoS Attack Origins

The DAO exchange suffered a recursive code attack earlier this year. This joint investment fund, which was built on top of the Ethereum network, was siphoned dry by a cybercriminal who figured out a way to sucker Ethereum’s internal code.

To salvage the stolen money, the Ethereum team had to do a hard fork and disseminate a new version of the network’s code. The fork wasn’t fatal to Ethereum, but it certainly was not pleasant.

Now someone is trying to slow the Ethereum network down by making it do more work than it should have to do to process a transaction.

Out of Memory

The first sign of trouble was when geth nodes started to crash in the network due to lack of memory on a specific block, according to Ethereum’s blog. The crash only affected clients that were based on the Go language, and Ethereum created a hotfix the next day to address it.

The postmortem showed that the underlying problem involved Ethereum’s EXTCODESIZE attribute, which is included in each transaction by design. An attacker could use this attribute to ask for additional checks against the Ethereum network database — up to 50,000 at a time. This results in much slower transaction confirmations.

Softpedia reported that these transactions are anonymous, which means that no details can be made available about the attacker’s identity.

A Model Response

According to the company, the net result of the Ethereum DDoS attack was a reduction in the rate of block creation by a factor of two or three.

“There was no consensus failure (i.e., network fork) and neither the network nor any client at any point fully halted,” the company wrote on its website. “The attack has since, as of the time of this writing, mostly halted, and the network has, for the time being, recovered.”

Ethereum responded aptly to what could have been a crippling situation. It fixed the problem, then announced to stakeholders exactly what needed be done, why it should be done and how to do it. Such a transparent and successful fix can serve as a model for others.

More from

2022 Industry Threat Recap: Finance and Insurance

The finance and insurance sector proved a top target for cybersecurity threats in 2022. The IBM Security X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2023 found this sector ranked as the second most attacked, with 18.9% of X-Force incident response cases. If, as Shakespeare tells us, past is prologue, this sector will likely remain a target in 2023. Finance and insurance ranked as the most attacked sector from 2016 to 2020, with the manufacturing sector the most attacked in 2021 and 2022. What…

X-Force Prevents Zero Day from Going Anywhere

This blog was made possible through contributions from Fred Chidsey and Joseph Lozowski. The X-Force Vulnerability and Exploit Database shows that the number of zero days being released each year is on the rise, but X-Force has observed that only a few of these zero days are rapidly adopted by cyber criminals each year. While every zero day is important and organizations should still devote efforts to patching zero days once a patch is released, there are characteristics of certain…

And Stay Out! Blocking Backdoor Break-Ins

Backdoor access was the most common threat vector in 2022. According to the 2023 IBM Security X-Force Threat Intelligence Index, 21% of incidents saw the use of backdoors, outpacing perennial compromise favorite ransomware, which came in at just 17%. The good news? In 67% of backdoor attacks, defenders were able to disrupt attacker efforts and lock digital doorways before ransomware payloads were deployed. The not-so-great news? With backdoor access now available at a bargain price on the dark web, businesses…

Hack-for-Hire Groups May Be the New Face of Cybercrime

Google’s Threat Analysis Group (TAG) recently released a report about growing hack-for-hire activity. In contrast to Malware-as-a-Service (MaaS), hack-for-hire firms conduct sophisticated, hands-on attacks. They target a wide range of users and exploit known security flaws when executing their campaigns. “We have seen hack-for-hire groups target human rights and political activists, journalists and other high-risk users around the world, putting their privacy, safety and security at risk,” Google TAG says. “They also conduct corporate espionage, handily obscuring their clients’ role.”…