February 6, 2017 By Mark Samuels 2 min read

Organizations primarily fear potential reputational and brand damage rather than a security breach itself. Still, many businesses lack a risk management strategy to abate those fears.

According to a Ponemon Institute survey sponsored by RiskVision, 76 percent of businesses lack a holistic approach to risk. The report also suggested that organizations are concerned about the long-term brand damage that results from a breach.

Negative Headlines Keep Executives Awake

Dr. Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute, said the results of the survey highlight organizations’ growing desire to understand their risk exposure. The requirement to comprehend risk, he said, has been prompted by an increasing number of high-profile data incidents and the resultant negative headlines.

While security incidents are expensive to remediate, the costs associated with reputational damage can be even greater. That explains why 63 percent of executives are primarily concerned about negative brand impact, while 51 percent are more worried about a security breach, according to the report.

Survey respondents were also notably concerned about business disruption (51 percent) and intellectual property loss (37 percent).

A Disconnect Between Theory and Practice

The research highlighted how growing fears around brand reputation and security breaches are helping to create a new executive-level focus on risk. As many as 82 percent of organizations indicated that risk management is now either a “significant” or “very significant” commitment.

However, a maturing risk program is no guarantee of success. The survey illustrated a separation between the theory of risk management strategy and on-the-ground implementation: Just 14 percent of executives indicated that their business have an effective risk management strategy.

Furthermore, 52 percent of organizations do not have a formal budget for enterprise risk management. This lack of resources is a significant impediment to controlling risk, according to 44 percent of respondents. The same number cited complexity as a challenge in this area, while 43 percent struggled to get started.

Senior Executives Must Take Risk Management Seriously

Joe Fantuzzi, CEO of RiskVision, said organizations must start to invest in risk measurement and analysis. He noted that more than two-thirds of business do not rate assets based on criticality or use metrics to assess risk management effectiveness.

The good news, according to Dark Reading, is that executives are waking up to the need for effective measurement. Just 21 percent of companies analyzed risk in real-time 18 months ago. Today, that figure stands at 32 percent. Gartner also noted an increased demand for risk management technologies.

Executives are increasingly waking up to the importance of a risk management strategy, but they must ensure their approach is more than simple lip service. Business leaders should create an all-encompassing strategy that focuses on measurement and action.

More from

Cybersecurity dominates concerns among the C-suite, small businesses and the nation

4 min read - Once relegated to the fringes of business operations, cybersecurity has evolved into a front-and-center concern for organizations worldwide. What was once considered a technical issue managed by IT departments has become a boardroom topic of utmost importance. With the rise of sophisticated cyberattacks, the growing use of generative AI by threat actors and massive data breach costs, it is no longer a question of whether cybersecurity matters but how deeply it affects every facet of modern operations.The 2024 Allianz Risk…

Autonomous security for cloud in AWS: Harnessing the power of AI for a secure future

3 min read - As the digital world evolves, businesses increasingly rely on cloud solutions to store data, run operations and manage applications. However, with this growth comes the challenge of ensuring that cloud environments remain secure and compliant with ever-changing regulations. This is where the idea of autonomous security for cloud (ASC) comes into play.Security and compliance aren't just technical buzzwords; they are crucial for businesses of all sizes. With data breaches and cyber threats on the rise, having systems that ensure your…

Adversarial advantage: Using nation-state threat analysis to strengthen U.S. cybersecurity

4 min read - Nation-state adversaries are changing their approach, pivoting from data destruction to prioritizing stealth and espionage. According to the Microsoft 2023 Digital Defense Report, "nation-state attackers are increasing their investments and launching more sophisticated cyberattacks to evade detection and achieve strategic priorities."These actors pose a critical threat to United States infrastructure and protected data, and compromising either resource could put citizens at risk.Thankfully, there's an upside to these malicious efforts: information. By analyzing nation-state tactics, government agencies and private enterprises are…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today