March 30, 2017 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

The FBI issued Private Industry Notification 170322-001 to smaller heath care offices about how cybercriminals are using an old method involving an FTP server to gain access to personally identifiable information (PII) about patients. The notification was launched March 22, 2017.

The warning focused on the file transfer protocol (FTP), an early way to share files remotely over the internet. Client programs would directly access servers that understood FTP and exfiltrate requested files. This method was largely made obsolete by more convenient file transfer methods.

However, the FBI cited 2015 research from the University of Michigan, which stated that 1 million FTP servers have been configured to allow anonymous access. And last year, security researcher Minxomat found about 800,000 anonymous FTP services were exposed, Network World noted.

Accessing Information With an FTP Server

Anonymous FTP, as it is called, does not require any authentication before granting access to the files on the system. It has long been recommended that a server with this service host only public files.

But smaller health care offices may use older, less sophisticated systems that could have been either misconfigured or not properly maintained. These offices may also have a limited understanding of what required routine maintenance entails; they could have anonymous FTP enabled by default, as opposed to a larger provider that has upgraded and tweaked its system.

The FBI warned that although the PII on these less sophisticated systems is of value, cybercriminals may just want the network access to carry out their own plans. While the personal health information (PHI) stored on these systems is protected by HIPAA statute and could be used maliciously by bad actors, it’s not the only issue associated with anonymous FTP.

Bad actors could warehouse the files used in malware distribution schemes in these convenient FTP silos, for example. Using these compromised systems in some distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks might be expected as well.

Peter Merkulov, vice president of product strategy and technology alliances for Globalscape, told CSO Online that he doesn’t even use non-anonymous FTP, since it is so dangerous and dated. He doesn’t see it used much these days, and if he does, it is usually an out-of-date implementation — such as a larger office whose forgotten implementation remains up because it just was never removed.

FBI Recommendations

The FBI recommended that health care entities contact their respective IT services personnel to scan office networks for anonymous FTP servers. Should the office have a legitimate use for operating a FTP server in anonymous mode, administrators must ensure that sensitive PHI or PII will not be stored on the server. If the FTP server is not needed, then the prudent course of action would be to shut it down so it can’t be used to create an attack vector.

More from

Hive0137 and AI-supplemented malware distribution

12 min read - IBM X-Force tracks dozens of threat actor groups. One group in particular, tracked by X-Force as Hive0137, has been a highly active malware distributor since at least October 2023. Nominated by X-Force as having the “Most Complex Infection Chain” in a campaign in 2023, Hive0137 campaigns deliver DarkGate, NetSupport, T34-Loader and Pikabot malware payloads, some of which are likely used for initial access in ransomware attacks. The crypters used in the infection chains also suggest a close relationship with former…

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

Crisis communication: What NOT to do

4 min read - Read the 1st blog in this series, Cybersecurity crisis communication: What to doWhen an organization experiences a cyberattack, tensions are high, customers are concerned and the business is typically not operating at full capacity. Every move you make at this point makes a difference to your company’s future, and even a seemingly small mistake can cause permanent reputational damage.Because of the stress and many moving parts that are involved, businesses often fall short when it comes to communication in a crisis.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today