October 5, 2015 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Halloween is just around the corner, and companies are doing everything they can to make sure the rest of 2015 is all treat and no trick. But for Adobe and its popular Flash Player, security flaws just won’t stay in the ground. According to CSO Online, a Flash bypass supposedly patched by the company’s last security update didn’t solve the problem. Now the bug is back from the digital grave to bother users again. Here are all the spooky details.

Adobe Rises Up

The Flash bypass technique CVE-2015-5560 was first caught in August 2015 and targeted by security update 18.0.0.232. While reproducing the bug to ensure its product would detect it, security company Morphisec discovered a few oddities. First, the exploit was encrypted upon delivery and required access to a server-side component to conclude. In practice, this is a more difficult attack vector and took Morphisec some time to duplicate, but it also means the exploit is disposable and, in turn, much more difficult for signature-based detection programs to identify and eliminate.

But the company also noticed something else: The attack still used vector exploitation of Flash version 18.0.0.209 despite assurances the problem had been fixed. Even with a major redesign to Flash and the addition of two specific mitigations, Morphisec found that Adobe “failed to mitigate the most popular and easiest method of vector corruptions to exploit.”

In other words, this wasn’t a case of corporate ignorance, but rather an excellent example of the current software security market: Nothing is ever perfectly secure. And solutions like Flash, which is still used by thousands of companies worldwide, offer big rewards for cybercriminals who discover critical flaws — enough that malicious actors are willing to find workarounds even after mitigation to bring these exploits back from the dead.

Familiar Door

This isn’t the first time Flash has been on the receiving end of an exploit attack. According to BBC, for example, similar warnings were issued in June 2015 about a vulnerability in version 18.0.0.160, which used the Angler toolkit to gain access and potentially deploy ransomware. Both the BBC and CSO Online noted that companies are often slow to update Flash despite existing vulnerabilities, with many running two or three versions behind.

Of course, it can be hard to keep up: ZDNet discussed the surprise critical update Adobe released on Sept. 21, which targeted 23 critical vulnerabilities. Some experts speculated that the off-schedule patch was a way to avoid disclosure dates for specific flaws and ensure users were patched ahead of public exploit knowledge.

Bottom line? The sheer number of Flash users coupled with its aging code makes it a gold mine for cybercriminals. Adobe is doing its best to keep up with emerging problems and stay ahead of disclosure dates, but as the most recent vector exploit demonstrated, even bugs that are in the ground don’t always stay dead.

For companies using Flash, it’s critical to patch frequently and also rely on regularly updated, real-time detection tools. For businesses that can avoid this long-in-the-tooth technology, meanwhile, staying out of the graveyard is a better choice than following the crowd.

More from

Protecting your digital assets from non-human identity attacks

4 min read - Untethered data accessibility and workflow automation are now foundational elements of most digital infrastructures. With the right applications and protocols in place, businesses no longer need to feel restricted by their lack of manpower or technical capabilities — machines are now filling those gaps.The use of non-human identities (NHIs) to power business-critical applications — especially those used in cloud computing environments or when facilitating service-to-service connections — has opened the doors for seamless operational efficiency. Unfortunately, these doors aren’t the…

Communication platforms play a major role in data breach risks

4 min read - Every online activity or task brings at least some level of cybersecurity risk, but some have more risk than others. Kiteworks Sensitive Content Communications Report found that this is especially true when it comes to using communication tools.When it comes to cybersecurity, communicating means more than just talking to another person; it includes any activity where you are transferring data from one point online to another. Companies use a wide range of different types of tools to communicate, including email,…

Research finds 56% increase in active ransomware groups

4 min read - Any good news is welcomed when evaluating cyber crime trends year-over-year. Over the last two years, IBM’s Threat Index Reports have provided some minor reprieve in this area by showing a gradual decline in the prevalence of ransomware attacks — now accounting for only 17% of all cybersecurity incidents compared to 21% in 2021. Unfortunately, it’s too early to know if this trendline will continue. A recent report released by Searchlight Cyber shows that there has been a 56% increase in…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today